0 9

Cited 0 times in

Comparative Hepatic Outcomes of SGLT2i or DPP4i Compared to GLP-1RA in CHB and T2DM Patients

Authors
 Byungyoon Yun  ;  Juyeon Oh  ;  Heejoo Park  ;  Jian Lee  ;  Beom Kyung Kim  ;  Jin-Ha Yoon 
Citation
 LIVER INTERNATIONAL, Vol.45(5) : e70060, 2025-05 
Journal Title
LIVER INTERNATIONAL
ISSN
 1478-3223 
Issue Date
2025-05
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / epidemiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy ; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors* / therapeutic use ; Female ; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists* ; Hepatitis B, Chronic* / complications ; Hepatitis B, Chronic* / drug therapy ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis / epidemiology ; Liver Neoplasms / epidemiology ; Liver Transplantation / statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Propensity Score ; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
Keywords
liver‐related events ; nationwide study ; new user cohort ; oral antidiabetic drugs ; propensity score matching
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of diabetes is increasing among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, the relative efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i), compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), among such at-risk populations remains unclear in terms of reducing liver-related events (LRE).

Methods: Using a nationwide database (2019-2022), we identified CHB patients with diabetes (age ≥ 40) and established two new-user cohorts: SGLT2i vs. GLP-1RA and DPP4i vs. GLP-1RA. LREs included hepatocellular carcinoma, cirrhosis, liver transplantation and liver-related mortality. For appropriate balancing, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for each cohort. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate LRE risk with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Propensity score matching provided two separate cohorts: (1) SGLT2i (n = 2297) vs. GLP-1RA (n = 461) and (2) DPP4i (n = 803) vs. GLP-1RA (n = 165) users. The LREs risk was similar across each comparison, with aHRs of 0.82 (95% CI 0.49-1.37) for GLP-1RA (vs. SGLT2i) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.41-2.07) for GLP-1RA (vs. DPP4i), indicating no significant differences. Subgroup analyses showed a trend favouring GLP-1RA over SGLT2i in females, obese individuals, antiviral therapy (AVT) users, those with diabetes complications, longer diabetes duration and physically active individuals. Compared with DPP4i, the trend was observed in AVT users and those with a shorter diabetes duration, though none were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Overall LRE risk was comparable between SGLT2i or DPP4i vs. GLP-1RA users. Further prospective studies are required to identify who can benefit from specific medication.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70060
DOI
10.1111/liv.70060
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Preventive Medicine (예방의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Beom Kyung(김범경) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5363-2496
Yun, Byungyoon(윤병윤)
Yoon, Jin Ha(윤진하) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-2955
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/205943
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links