Cited 0 times in

Comparison of Early and Late Norepinephrine Administration in Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors
 Chiwon Ahn  ;  Gina Yu  ;  Tae Gun Shin  ;  Youngsuk Cho  ;  Sunghoon Park  ;  Gee Young Suh 
Citation
 CHEST, Vol.166(6) : 1417-1430, 2024-12 
Journal Title
CHEST
ISSN
 0012-3692 
Issue Date
2024-12
MeSH
Drug Administration Schedule ; Humans ; Norepinephrine* / administration & dosage ; Norepinephrine* / therapeutic use ; Shock, Septic* / drug therapy ; Shock, Septic* / mortality ; Time Factors ; Vasoconstrictor Agents* / administration & dosage ; Vasoconstrictor Agents* / therapeutic use
Keywords
meta-analysis ; norepinephrine ; sepsis ; septic shock ; timing ; vasopressor
Abstract
Background: Vasopressor administration at an appropriate time is crucial, but the optimal timing remains controversial.

Research question: Does early vs late norepinephrine administration impact the prognosis of septic shock?

Study design and methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KMbase databases. We included studies of adults with sepsis and categorized patients into an early and late norepinephrine group according to specific time points or differences in norepinephrine use protocols. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, days free from ventilator use, days free from renal replacement therapy, days free from vasopressor use, adverse events, and total fluid volume.

Results: Twelve studies (four randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and eight observational studies) comprising 7,281 patients were analyzed. For overall mortality, no significant difference was found between the early norepinephrine group and late norepinephrine group in RCTs (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.19) or observational studies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.29). In the two RCTs without a restrictive fluid strategy that prioritized vasopressors and lower IV fluid volumes, the early norepinephrine group showed significantly lower mortality than the late norepinephrine group (OR, 0.49; 95%, CI, 0.25-0.96). The early norepinephrine group demonstrated more mechanical ventilator-free days in observational studies (mean difference, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.82-5.30). The incidence of pulmonary edema was lower in the early norepinephrine group in the three RCTs that reported this outcome (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74). No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes.

Interpretation: Overall mortality did not differ significantly between early and late norepinephrine administration for septic shock. However, early norepinephrine administration seemed to reduce pulmonary edema incidence, and mortality improvement was observed in studies without fluid restriction interventions, favoring early norepinephrine use.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369224045811
DOI
10.1016/j.chest.2024.05.042
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Emergency Medicine (응급의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yu, Gina(유지나)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/204503
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links