Cited 0 times in

Postoperative complications of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiation therapy in patients with implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
 Seong-Hyuk Park  ;  Yun-Jung Yang  ;  Sihyun Sung  ;  Yelim Choi  ;  Eun-Jung Yang 
Citation
 BREAST, Vol.77 : 103782, 2024-10 
Journal Title
BREAST
ISSN
 0960-9776 
Issue Date
2024-10
MeSH
Breast Implantation* / adverse effects ; Breast Implantation* / methods ; Breast Implants / adverse effects ; Breast Neoplasms* / radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms* / surgery ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Female ; Humans ; Mastectomy* ; Postoperative Complications* / epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications* / etiology ; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation* ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant / adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant / methods
Keywords
Breast reconstruction ; Meta-analysis ; Postoperative complications ; Radiation therapy ; Systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy is an important component of adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients. However, radiation to reconstructed breasts can cause various complications. Recently, hypofractionated (HF) protocols have been adopted in several countries. Here, we aimed to assess the impact of HF protocols on implant-reconstructed breasts through a meta-analysis and systematic review of the currently available literature.

Methods: Records published until August 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Keywords included hypofractionation radiotherapy, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Studies that utilized HF and conventional fractionation (CF) after prosthetic reconstruction were selected. Due to the rarity of events in outcomes, Mantel-Haenszel's odds ratios were calculated using a fixed-effect model to compare the complication rates between HF and CF groups. For analysis with high heterogeneity, a random effect model was used.

Results: Seven articles with 924 implant reconstructions, in which 506 (54.8 %) underwent HF were included. HF patients received 43.8 Gy on average, while CF patients received 51.2 Gy. Mean follow-up ranged from 10.6 to 35 months. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. HF groups had a significantly lower risk of capsular contracture (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11-0.55), major revision surgery (OR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.05-0.80), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07-0.78) compared to CF groups. The risks of other complications were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study indicates that HF protocols are associated with fewer complications than CF protocols in implant-reconstructed patients. These findings suggest that the application of HF PMRT in implant-reconstructed patients with breast cancer is plausible.
Files in This Item:
T202405606.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.breast.2024.103782
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (성형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yang, Eun-Jung(양은정)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/204483
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links