Cited 0 times in

Palbociclib plus exemestane with GnRH agonist vs capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: Updated survival results of the randomized phase 2 study Young-PEARL.

Authors
 Yeon Hee Park  ;  Kyung-Hun Lee  ;  Gun Min Kim  ;  Seok Yun Kang  ;  Keun Seok Lee  ;  Jee Hyun Kim  ;  Kyoung Eun Lee  ;  Hee Kyung Ahn  ;  Moon Hee Lee  ;  Hee Jun Kim  ;  Hanjo Kim  ;  Su-Jin Koh  ;  Ji-Yeon Kim  ;  Joohyuk Sohn  ;  Sung-Bae Kim  ;  Jin Seok Ahn  ;  Seonwoo Kim  ;  Hyun Cho  ;  Kyung Hae Jung  ;  Seock-Ah Im 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.42(17_SUPPL) : LBA1002, 2024-06 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2024-06
Abstract
Background: The Young-PEARL study demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) (mPFS: 20.1 vs. 14.4 mo.) of exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared to capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here we report updated survival outcomes with median follow-up of 54.8 months (data cutoff, November 30, 2023). Methods: Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with HR+/HER2- BC who had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. One line of previous chemotherapy for mBC was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS, which was defined as the time from C1D1 to disease progression or death. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Results: 184 patients were randomly assigned to exemestane plus palbociclib with OFS (n=92) or capecitabine (n=92). Median age was 44.0 years (range, 28-58). Key efficacy and safety are shown in Table. Final analysis was conducted for 174 patients. The updated mPFS was 19.5 mo. (90% CI, 14.3-22.3) for exemestane + palbociclib + OFS compared with 14.0 mo. (90% CI, 11.7-18.7) for capecitabine (HR 0.75, P=0.04). mOS was 54.8 mo. (95% CI, 48.9-77.1) for palbociclib arm and 57.8 mo. (95% CI, 46.3-N/A) for capecitabine arm (HR 1.06, P=0.77). mPFS2 (from the date of 1st PD to 2nd PD) was significantly shorter in palbociclib arm than those of capecitabine arm (7.5 vs. 11.7 mo. P=0.02). Confirmed ORR based on the investigator assessments was 33.3% (95% CI, 23.6-43.1) for palbociclib and 33.7% (95% CI, 23.6-43.9) for capecitabine. Median treatment duration was 18.9 mo. (range 1.6-88.4) in palbociclib and 13.5 mo. (range 0.1-70.8) in capecitabine. In palbociclib arm, 86 (93.5%) experienced grade 3 or more TEAEs, mainly asymptomatic neutropenia (64.1%), compared to 41 (48.2%) patients with grade ≥3 TEAEs in the capecitabine arm, mainly Hand-Foot syndrome and neutropenia (18.8% for each). Conclusions: Young-PEARL study showed exemestane + palbociclib with OFS improves efficacy compared with capecitabine in terms of PFS, which did not lead to an OS benefit for patients with premenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC (median follow-up duration: 54.8 months). The overall safety profile of palbociclib and capecitabine continues to be manageable with longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746.
Full Text
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1002
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1002
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Sohn, Joo Hyuk(손주혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-2764
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/202256
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links