Cited 0 times in

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of an alternative dosing regimen of sasanlimab in participants with advanced NSCLC and other malignancies

Authors
 Konstantin Penkov  ;  Igor Bondarenko  ;  Daria Viktorovna Saenko  ;  Yaroslav Kulyaba  ;  Jun Guo  ;  Yi Gong  ;  Noboru Yamamoto  ;  Yevhen Stepanovych Hotko  ;  Vasyl Boyko  ;  Natalya Vladimirovna Fadeeva  ;  Grygorii Mykolaiovych Ursol  ;  Hee Kyung Ahn  ;  Nikolay Viktorovich Kislov  ;  Chia-I Shen  ;  Craig Davis  ;  Karey Kowalski  ;  Elisabete Michelon  ;  Dmitri Pavlov  ;  Tomoko Hirohashi  ;  Byoung Chul Cho 
Citation
 THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.16 : 17588359241274592, 2024-09 
Journal Title
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 1758-8340 
Issue Date
2024-09
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitor ; immunotherapy ; lung neoplasms ; non-small-cell lung cancer ; programmed cell death 1 receptor
Abstract
Background: Sasanlimab (PF-06801591), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, binds to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), preventing ligand (PD-L1) interaction.

Objectives: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two subcutaneous sasanlimab dosing regimens.

Design: An open-label study consisting of phases Ib and II. Phase Ib: non-randomized, dose escalation, and expansion study in Asian participants with advanced malignancies.

Phase ii: conducted globally in participants with non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 positive or PD-L1 status unknown tumors; participants were randomized 1:2 to receive subcutaneous sasanlimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks (300 mg-Q4W) or 600 mg once every 6 weeks (600 mg-Q6W).

Methods: Primary endpoint in phase Ib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in first treatment cycle; in phase II: C trough and AUC.

Results: A total of 155 participants (phase Ib, n = 34; phase II, n = 121) received sasanlimab. Phase Ib: no DLT reported. Phase II: ratio of adjusted geometric mean for AUCtau was 231.2 (90% CI, 190.1-281.2) and C trough was 111.5 (90% CI, 86.3-144.0) following 600 mg-Q6W (test) versus 300 mg-Q4W (reference). Phase Ib: grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 1/4 (25%) and 3/12 (25%) participants treated in 300 mg-Q4W dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Phase II: grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/80 (3.8%) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively; no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Phase II: confirmed objective response was observed in 11/41 (26.8% (95% CI, 14.2-42.9)) and 12/80 (15.0% (95% CI, 8.0-24.7)) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively.

Conclusions: Phase Ib regimens were considered safe with no DLTs reported. In phase II, 600 mg-Q6W regimen criteria were met for AUCtau and C trough metrics to support PK-based extrapolation of efficacy of alternative regimen. Regimens were well tolerated, showing anti-tumor activity in participants with advanced solid tumors. Administration of sasanlimab at a dose of 600 mg-Q6W subcutaneously may serve as a convenient alternative to 300 mg-Q4W administration.

Trial registration: NCT04181788 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2019-003818-14 (EudraCT).
Files in This Item:
T992024613.pdf Download
DOI
10.1177/17588359241274592
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Byoung Chul(조병철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-270X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/202250
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links