Cited 0 times in

Current Status of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms in Korea

Authors
 Mikyoung Park  ;  Jihyang Lim  ;  Ari Ahn  ;  Eun-Jee Oh  ;  Jaewoo Song  ;  Kyeong-Hee Kim  ;  Jin-Yeong Han  ;  Hyun-Woo Choi  ;  Joo-Heon Park  ;  Kyung-Hwa Shin  ;  Hyerim Kim  ;  Miyoung Kim  ;  Sang-Hyun Hwang  ;  Hyun-Young Kim  ;  Duck Cho  ;  Eun-Suk Kang 
Citation
 ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, Vol.44(3) : 222-234, 2024-05 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
ISSN
 2234-3806 
Issue Date
2024-05
MeSH
Antibodies ; Flow Cytometry / methods ; Humans ; Immunophenotyping ; Neoplasms* ; Republic of Korea
Keywords
Flow cytometry ; Hematolymphoid neoplasm ; Immunophenotyping ; Minimal residual disease ; Plasma cell neoplasm
Abstract
Background: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is essential for diagnosis, classification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. FCI-HLN is typically performed using in-house protocols, raising the need for standardization. Therefore, we surveyed the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea to obtain fundamental data for quality improvement and standardization.

Methods: Eight university hospitals actively conducting FCI-HLN participated in our survey. We analyzed responses to a questionnaire that included inquiries regarding test items, reagent antibodies (RAs), fluorophores, sample amounts (SAs), reagent antibody amounts (RAAs), acquisition cell number (ACN), isotype control (IC) usage, positive/negative criteria, and reporting.

Results: Most hospitals used acute HLN, chronic HLN, plasma cell neoplasm (PCN), and MRD panels. The numbers of RAs were heterogeneous, with a maximum of 32, 26, 12, 14, and 10 antibodies used for acute HLN, chronic HLN, PCN, ALL-MRD, and multiple myeloma-MRD, respectively. The number of fluorophores ranged from 4 to 10. RAs, SAs, RAAs, and ACN were diverse. Most hospitals used a positive criterion of 20%, whereas one used 10% for acute and chronic HLN panels. Five hospitals used ICs for the negative criterion. Positive/negative assignments, percentages, and general opinions were commonly reported. In MRD reporting, the limit of detection and lower limit of quantification were included.

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive study on the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea, confirming the high heterogeneity and complexity of FCI-HLN practices. Standardization of FCI-HLN is urgently needed. The findings provide a reference for establishing standard FCI-HLN guidelines.
Files in This Item:
T992024158.pdf Download
DOI
10.3343/alm.2023.0298
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Song, Jae Woo(송재우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-5731
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201870
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links