Automated Organ Segmentation for Radiation Therapy: A Comparative Analysis of AI-Based Tools Versus Manual Contouring in Korean Cancer Patients

Abstract

Background: Accurate delineation of tumors and organs at risk (OARs) is crucial for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of OncoStudio, an AI-based auto-segmentation tool developed for Korean patients, compared with Protégé AI, a globally developed tool that uses data from Korean cancer patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1200 Korean cancer patients treated with radiotherapy was conducted. Auto-contours generated via OncoStudio and Protégé AI were compared with manual contours across the head and neck and thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic organs. Accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). Feedback was obtained from 10 participants, including radiation oncologists, residents, and radiation therapists, via an online survey with a Turing test component.

Results: OncoStudio outperformed Protégé AI in 85% of the evaluated OARs (p < 0.001). For head and neck organs, OncoStudio achieved a similar DSC (0.70 vs. 0.70, p = 0.637) but significantly lower MSD and 95% HD values (p < 0.001). In thoracic organs, OncoStudio performed excellently in 90% of cases, with a significantly greater DSC (male: 0.87 vs. 0.82, p < 0.001; female: 0.95 vs. 0.87, p < 0.001). OncoStudio also demonstrated superior accuracy in abdominal (DSC 0.88 vs. 0.81, p < 0.001) and pelvic organs (male: DSC 0.95 vs. 0.85, p < 0.001; female: DSC 0.82 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001). Clinicians favored OncoStudio in 70% of cases, with 90% endorsing its clinical suitability for Korean patients.

Conclusions: OncoStudio, which is tailored for Korean patients, demonstrated superior segmentation accuracy across multiple anatomical regions, suggesting its suitability for radiotherapy planning in this population.