Assessment of Patient-Derived Xenograft Growth and Antitumor Activity: The NCI PDXNet Consensus Recommendations
Authors
Funda Meric-Bernstam ; Michael W Lloyd ; Soner Koc ; Yvonne A Evrard ; Lisa M McShane ; Michael T Lewis ; Kurt W Evans ; Dali Li ; Lawrence Rubinstein ; Alana Welm ; Dennis A Dean 2nd ; Anuj Srivastava ; Jeffrey W Grover ; Min J Ha ; Huiqin Chen ; Xuelin Huang ; Kaushik Varadarajan ; Jing Wang ; Jack A Roth ; Bryan Welm ; Ramaswamy Govinden ; Li Ding ; Salma Kaochar ; Nicholas Mitsiades ; Luis Carvajal-Carmona ; Meenhard Herylyn ; Michael A Davies ; Geoffrey I Shapiro ; Ryan Fields ; Jose G Trevino ; Joshua C Harrell ; NCI PDXNet Consortium ; James H Doroshow ; Jeffrey H Chuang ; Jeffrey A Moscow
Citation
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, Vol.23(7) : 924-938, 2024-07
Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents / pharmacology ; Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use ; Consensus ; Humans ; Mice ; National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ; Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Neoplasms* / pathology ; United States ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays*
Abstract
Although patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are commonly used for preclinical modeling in cancer research, a standard approach to in vivo tumor growth analysis and assessment of antitumor activity is lacking, complicating the comparison of different studies and determination of whether a PDX experiment has produced evidence needed to consider a new therapy promising. We present consensus recommendations for assessment of PDX growth and antitumor activity, providing public access to a suite of tools for in vivo growth analyses. We expect that harmonizing PDX study design and analysis and assessing a suite of analytical tools will enhance information exchange and facilitate identification of promising novel therapies and biomarkers for guiding cancer therapy.