2 16

Cited 0 times in

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study

Authors
 Robert J Motzer  ;  Camillo Porta  ;  Masatoshi Eto  ;  Thomas Powles  ;  Viktor Grünwald  ;  Thomas E Hutson  ;  Boris Alekseev  ;  Sun Young Rha  ;  Jaime Merchan  ;  Jeffrey C Goh  ;  Aly-Khan A Lalani  ;  Ugo De Giorgi  ;  Bohuslav Melichar  ;  Sung-Hoo Hong  ;  Howard Gurney  ;  María José Méndez-Vidal  ;  Evgeny Kopyltsov  ;  Sergei Tjulandin  ;  Teresa Alonso Gordoa  ;  Vadim Kozlov  ;  Anna Alyasova  ;  Eric Winquist  ;  Pablo Maroto  ;  Miso Kim  ;  Avivit Peer  ;  Giuseppe Procopio  ;  Toshio Takagi  ;  Shirley Wong  ;  Jens Bedke  ;  Manuela Schmidinger  ;  Karla Rodriguez-Lopez  ;  Joseph Burgents  ;  Cixin He  ;  Chinyere E Okpara  ;  Jodi McKenzie  ;  Toni K Choueiri  ;  CLEAR Trial Investigators 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.42(11) : 1222-1228, 2024-04 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2024-04
MeSH
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell* / pathology ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms* / pathology ; Phenylurea Compounds* ; Quinolines* ; Sunitinib / adverse effects ; Survival Analysis
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We present the final prespecified overall survival (OS) analysis of the open-label, phase III CLEAR study in treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). With an additional follow-up of 23 months from the primary analysis, we report results from the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib comparison of CLEAR. Treatment-naïve patients with aRCC were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily [4 weeks on/2 weeks off]). At this data cutoff date (July 31, 2022), the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). The median OS (95% CI) was 53.7 months (95% CI, 48.7 to not estimable [NE]) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 54.3 months (95% CI, 40.9 to NE) with sunitinib; 36-month OS rates (95% CI) were 66.4% (95% CI, 61.1 to 71.2) and 60.2% (95% CI, 54.6 to 65.2), respectively. The median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 23.9 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 27.7) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 11.0) with sunitinib (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.57]). Objective response rate also favored the combination over sunitinib (71.3% v 36.7%; relative risk 1.94 [95% CI, 1.67 to 2.26]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in >90% of patients who received either treatment. In conclusion, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab achieved consistent, durable benefit with a manageable safety profile in treatment-naïve patients with aRCC.
Files in This Item:
T202404146.pdf Download
DOI
10.1200/JCO.23.01569
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Sun Young(라선영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-4531
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200072
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links