2 16

Cited 0 times in

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author라선영-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T05:21:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-18T05:21:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200072-
dc.description.abstractClinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We present the final prespecified overall survival (OS) analysis of the open-label, phase III CLEAR study in treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). With an additional follow-up of 23 months from the primary analysis, we report results from the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib comparison of CLEAR. Treatment-naïve patients with aRCC were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily [4 weeks on/2 weeks off]). At this data cutoff date (July 31, 2022), the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). The median OS (95% CI) was 53.7 months (95% CI, 48.7 to not estimable [NE]) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 54.3 months (95% CI, 40.9 to NE) with sunitinib; 36-month OS rates (95% CI) were 66.4% (95% CI, 61.1 to 71.2) and 60.2% (95% CI, 54.6 to 65.2), respectively. The median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 23.9 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 27.7) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 11.0) with sunitinib (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.57]). Objective response rate also favored the combination over sunitinib (71.3% v 36.7%; relative risk 1.94 [95% CI, 1.67 to 2.26]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in >90% of patients who received either treatment. In conclusion, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab achieved consistent, durable benefit with a manageable safety profile in treatment-naïve patients with aRCC.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized*-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Renal Cell* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKidney Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHPhenylurea Compounds*-
dc.subject.MESHQuinolines*-
dc.subject.MESHSunitinib / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Analysis-
dc.titleLenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRobert J Motzer-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCamillo Porta-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMasatoshi Eto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThomas Powles-
dc.contributor.googleauthorViktor Grünwald-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThomas E Hutson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBoris Alekseev-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun Young Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJaime Merchan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeffrey C Goh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAly-Khan A Lalani-
dc.contributor.googleauthorUgo De Giorgi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBohuslav Melichar-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung-Hoo Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHoward Gurney-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMaría José Méndez-Vidal-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEvgeny Kopyltsov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSergei Tjulandin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTeresa Alonso Gordoa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVadim Kozlov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAnna Alyasova-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEric Winquist-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPablo Maroto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMiso Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAvivit Peer-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe Procopio-
dc.contributor.googleauthorToshio Takagi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShirley Wong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJens Bedke-
dc.contributor.googleauthorManuela Schmidinger-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKarla Rodriguez-Lopez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoseph Burgents-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCixin He-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChinyere E Okpara-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJodi McKenzie-
dc.contributor.googleauthorToni K Choueiri-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCLEAR Trial Investigators-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.23.01569-
dc.contributor.localIdA01316-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid38227898-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Sun Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor라선영-
dc.citation.volume42-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage1222-
dc.citation.endPage1228-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.42(11) : 1222-1228, 2024-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.