0 15

Cited 0 times in

A comparative study of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses combining bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김태임-
dc.contributor.author서경률-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T05:19:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-18T05:19:44Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200062-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the visual performance of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) that combine both bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles, Artis® Symbiose® Plus (Symbiose Plus; Cristalens Industrie, Lannion, France) and Tecnis® Synergy® (Synergy; Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Methods: The medical records of patients with cataract bilaterally implanted with either Symbiose Plus or Synergy between January 2022 and January 2023 were assessed. The principal measures of postoperative findings included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near (40 and 33 cm) visual acuity (UNVA), objective optical quality (OOQ) parameters, distance-corrected defocus curve analysis, and surveys of subjective satisfaction. Results: Total of 96 eyes from 48 patients were enrolled. Each group was equally composed of 24 patients, 48 eyes. There were no significant differences between the two groups on baseline characteristics. Both IOLs displayed excellent binocular UDVA, CDVA, and UNVA (40 and 33 cm) with no statistical difference (p = 0.467(UDVA), p = 0.584(CDVA), p = 0.096(40-cm UNVA), and p = 0.621(33-cm UNVA)). However, with regard to UIVA, the Synergy group showed significantly superior results (p < 0.001). In contrast, the Symbiose Plus group showed significantly better results on OOQ parameters and patient-reported quality of vision survey outcomes (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both IOLs provided a decent continuous range of vision from near to far distance. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKluwer-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLens Implantation, Intraocular / methods-
dc.subject.MESHLenses, Intraocular*-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.MESHPhacoemulsification*-
dc.subject.MESHPresbyopia* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRefraction, Ocular-
dc.subject.MESHVision, Binocular-
dc.titleA comparative study of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses combining bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeongmin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae-Im Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyoung Yul Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHungwon Tchah-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyungmin Koh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-024-02979-0-
dc.contributor.localIdA01080-
dc.contributor.localIdA01870-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03616-
dc.identifier.pmid38341384-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-024-02979-0-
dc.subject.keywordBifocal-
dc.subject.keywordContinuous range of vision-
dc.subject.keywordExtended depth-of-focus-
dc.subject.keywordIntermediate vision-
dc.subject.keywordIntraocular lens-
dc.subject.keywordNear vision-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Tae Im-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김태임-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서경률-
dc.citation.volume44-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage54-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, Vol.44(1) : 54, 2024-02-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.