0 296

Cited 0 times in

Cited 90 times in

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors
 Kang, Do-Yoon  ;  Ahn, Jung-Min  ;  Yun, Sung-Cheol  ;  Hur, Seung-Ho  ;  Cho, Yun-Kyeong  ;  Lee, Cheol Hyun  ;  Hong, Soon Jun  ;  Lim, Subin  ;  Kim, Sang-Wook  ;  Won, Hoyoun  ;  Oh, Jun-Hyok  ;  Choe, Jeong Cheon  ;  Hong, Young Joon  ;  Yoon, Yong-Hoon  ;  Kim, Hoyun  ;  Choi, Yeonwoo  ;  Lee, Jinho  ;  Yoon, Young Won  ;  Kim, Soo-Joong  ;  Bae, Jang-Ho  ;  Park, Duk-Woo  ;  Park, Seung-Jung 
Citation
 CIRCULATION, Vol.148(16) : 1195-1206, 2023-10 
Journal Title
CIRCULATION
ISSN
 0009-7322 
Issue Date
2023-10
Keywords
cardiac imaging techniques ; percutaneous coronary intervention ; tomography, optical coherence ; ultrasonography, interventional
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown.METHODS:In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed.RESULTS:At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial.REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique number: NCT03394079.
DOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yoon, Young Won(윤영원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0907-0350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198393
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links