37 78

Cited 0 times in

A Survey of Practice Patterns for Clinical Nodal Staging Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Authors
 Han-Byoel Lee  ;  Kyung-Hun Lee  ;  Seok Hyun Song  ;  Kyubo Kim  ;  Hong Kyu Kim  ;  Hyeong-Gon Moon  ;  Wonshik Han  ;  Dae-Won Lee  ;  Seock-Ah Im  ;  Bum-Sup Jang  ;  Yong Bae Kim  ;  Jonghan Yu  ;  Jee Hyun Kim  ;  Yeon Hee Park  ;  Kyung Hwan Shin  ;  Ji Hyun Chang 
Citation
 ONCOLOGIST, Vol.28(12) : e1142-e1151, 2023-12 
Journal Title
ONCOLOGIST
ISSN
 1083-7159 
Issue Date
2023-12
MeSH
Breast Neoplasms* / pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Surveys and Questionnaires
Keywords
breast cancer ; chemotherapy ; neoadjuvant therapy ; radiotherapy ; staging ; surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of clinical staging in breast cancer has increased owing to the wide use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). This study aimed to investigate the current practice patterns regarding clinical nodal staging in breast cancer in real-world settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was administered to board-certified oncologists in Korea, including breast surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, from January to April 2022. The survey included 19 general questions and 4 case-based questions. RESULTS: In total, 122 oncologists (45 radiation, 44 surgical, and 33 medical oncologists) completed the survey. Among them, 108 (88%) responded that clinical staging before NST was primarily performed by breast surgeons. All the respondents referred to imaging studies during nodal staging. Overall, 64 (52.5%) responders determined the stage strictly based on the radiology reports, whereas 58 (47.5%) made their own decision while noting radiology reports. Of those who made their own decisions, 88% referred to the number or size of the suspicious node. Of the 75 respondents involved in prescribing regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 (77.3%) responded that the reimbursement regulations in the selection of NST regimens affected nodal staging in clinical practice. In the case-based questions, high variability was observed among the clinicians in the same cases. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse assessments by specialists owing to the lack of a clear, harmonized staging system for the clinical nodal staging of breast cancer can lead to diverse practice patterns. Thus, practical, harmonized, and objective methods for clinical nodal staging and for the outcomes of post-NST response are warranted for appropriate treatment decisions and accurate outcome evaluation. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
Files in This Item:
T999202368.pdf Download
DOI
10.1093/oncolo/oyad156
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Yong Bae(김용배) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6862
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198168
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links