110 377

Cited 0 times in

Cited 2 times in

Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study

Authors
 Kim, Jihye  ;  Hur, Moon Haeng  ;  Kim, Seung Up  ;  Kim, Jin-Wook  ;  Sinn, Dong Hyun  ;  Lee, Hyun Woong  ;  Kim, Moon Young  ;  Cheong, Jae Youn  ;  Jung, Yong Jin  ;  Lee, Han Ah  ;  Jin, Young-Joo  ;  Yoon, Jun Sik  ;  Park, Sung-Jae  ;  Lee, Chang Hun  ;  Kim, In Hee  ;  Lee, June Sung  ;  Cho, Young Youn  ;  Kim, Hyung Joon  ;  Park, Soo Young  ;  Seo, Yeon Seok  ;  Oh, Hyunwoo  ;  Jun, Dae Won  ;  Kim, Mi Na  ;  Chang, Young  ;  Jang, Jae Young  ;  Hwang, Sang Youn  ;  Kim, Yoon Jun 
Citation
 CANCERS, Vol.15(11), 2023-05 
Article Number
 2936 
Journal Title
CANCERS
ISSN
 2072-6694 
Issue Date
2023-05
Keywords
entecavir ; tenofovir ; liver cancer ; extrahepatic malignancy ; virologic response
Abstract
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is reportedly superior or at least comparable to entecavir (ETV) in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients; however, it remains controversial. This study aimed to conduct comprehensive comparisons between the two antivirals. CHB patients initially treated with ETV or TDF between 2012 and 2015 at 20 referral centers in Korea were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of HCC. The secondary outcomes included death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, extrahepatic malignancy, development of cirrhosis, decompensation events, complete virologic response (CVR), seroconversion rate, and safety. Baseline characteristics were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Overall, 4210 patients were enrolled: 1019 received ETV and 3191 received TDF. During the median follow-ups of 5.6 and 5.5 years, 86 and 232 cases of HCC were confirmed in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively. There was no difference in HCC incidence between the groups both before (p = 0.36) and after IPTW was applied (p = 0.81). Although the incidence of extrahepatic malignancy was significantly higher in the ETV group than in the TDF group before weighting (p = 0.02), no difference was confirmed after IPTW (p = 0.29). The cumulative incidence rates of death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, new cirrhosis development, and decompensation events were also comparable in the crude population (p = 0.24-0.91) and in the IPTW-adjusted population (p = 0.39-0.80). Both groups exhibited similar rates of CVR (ETV vs. TDF: 95.1% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.38), and negative conversion of hepatitis B e antigen (41.6% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.09) or surface antigen (2.8% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.10). Compared to the ETV group, more patients in the TDF group changed initial antivirals due to side effects, including decreased kidney function (n = 17), hypophosphatemia (n = 20), and osteoporosis (n = 18). In this large-scale multicenter study, ETV and TDF demonstrated comparable effectiveness across a broad range of outcomes in patients with treatment-naive CHB during similar follow-up periods.
DOI
10.3390/cancers15112936
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Seung Up(김승업) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9658-8050
Lee, Hyun Woong(이현웅) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-3035
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197779
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links