0 112

Cited 1 times in

Randomized, two-arm, noncomparative phase 2 study of olaparib plus cediranib or durvalumab in HRR-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A substudy of KGOG 3045

Authors
 Yoo-Na Kim  ;  Je-Gun Joung  ;  Eunhyang Park  ;  Jae-Weon Kim  ;  Jung Bok Lee  ;  Jinyeong Lim  ;  Sunghoon Kim  ;  Chel Hun Choi  ;  Hee Seung Kim  ;  Jongsuk Chung  ;  Byoung-Gie Kim  ;  Jung-Yun Lee 
Citation
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Vol.153(12) : 2032-2044, 2023-12 
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN
 0020-7136 
Issue Date
2023-12
MeSH
Antineoplastic Agents* / therapeutic use ; Biomarkers ; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / drug therapy ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / chemically induced ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / genetics ; Phthalazines / therapeutic use ; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors / therapeutic use ; Recombinational DNA Repair ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / genetics
Keywords
homologous recombination repair mutation ; immune checkpoint inhibitor ; olaparib-based combination ; platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer ; poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor
Abstract
Choosing an optimal concomitant drug for combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor based on patient-specific biomarker status may help increase to improve treatment efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of different PARP inhibitor-based combinations in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have not been evaluated in ovarian cancer. In this sub-study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3045, we compared the efficacy and safety of two olaparib-based combinations and biomarkers of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with HRR gene mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either olaparib (200 mg twice a day) + cediranib (30 mg daily) (Arm 1, n = 16) or olaparib (300 mg) + durvalumab (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks) (Arm 2, n = 14). The objective response rates for Arm 1 and Arm 2 were 50.0% and 42.9%, respectively. Most patients (83.3%) had BRCA mutations, which were similarly distributed between arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 37.5% and 35.7% of the patients, respectively, but all were managed properly. A high vascular endothelial growth factor signature was associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 1, whereas immune markers (PD-L1 expression [CPS ≥10], CD8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 2. The activation of homologous recombination pathway upon disease progression was associated with poor response to subsequent therapy. Based on comprehensive biomarker profiling, including immunohistochemistry, whole-exome and RNA sequencing and whole blood-based analyses, we identified biomarkers that could help inform which of the two combination strategies is appropriate given a patient's biomarker status. Our findings have the potential to improve treatment outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in the PARP inhibitor era.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34696
DOI
10.1002/ijc.34696
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Hoon(김성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-7473
Kim, Yoo‐Na(김유나)
Park, Eunhyang(박은향) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2658-5054
Lee, Jung-Yun(이정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-1350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197386
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links