0 94

Cited 18 times in

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301

Authors
 Byoung Chul Cho  ;  Myung-Ju Ahn  ;  Jin Hyoung Kang  ;  Ross A Soo  ;  Thanyanan Reungwetwattana  ;  James Chih-Hsin Yang  ;  Irfan Cicin  ;  Dong-Wan Kim  ;  Yi-Long Wu  ;  Shun Lu  ;  Ki Hyeong Lee  ;  Yong-Kek Pang  ;  Anastasia Zimina  ;  Chin Heng Fong  ;  Elena Poddubskaya  ;  Ahmet Sezer  ;  Soon Hin How  ;  Pongwut Danchaivijitr  ;  YuKyung Kim  ;  Yeji Lim  ;  Taewon An  ;  Hana Lee  ;  Hae Mi Byun  ;  Bojan Zaric 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.41(26) : 4208-4217, 2023-09 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2023-09
MeSH
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / genetics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / pathology ; ErbB Receptors / genetics ; Gefitinib / therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms* / genetics ; Lung Neoplasms* / pathology ; Mutation ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors / adverse effects
Abstract
Purpose: Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods: Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.

Results: Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles.

Conclusion: Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.
Full Text
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.00515
DOI
10.1200/JCO.23.00515
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Byoung Chul(조병철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-270X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196847
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links