15 71

Cited 2 times in

Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Left Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score Analyses Using Retrospective Japanese and Korean Individual Patient Data

Authors
 Masaki Kaibori  ;  Kengo Yoshii  ;  Yuzo Umeda  ;  Takahito Yagi  ;  Takehiro Okabayashi  ;  Kenta Sui  ;  Akira Mori  ;  Yuhei Hamaguchi  ;  Kiyoshi Kajiyama  ;  Daisuke Hokuto  ;  Kazuteru Monden  ;  Tomoharu Yoshizumi  ;  Yoriko Nomura  ;  Kan Toriguchi  ;  Jong Man Kim  ;  Gi Hong Choi  ;  Je Ho Ryu  ;  Yangseok Koh  ;  Koo Jeong Kang  ;  Young Kyoung You  ;  Kwang-Sik Chun  ;  Young Seok Han  ;  Chan Woo Cho  ;  Young Il Choi  ;  Dong-Sik Kim  ;  Jae Do Yang  ;  Keita Mori  ;  Atsushi Hiraoka  ;  Hiroki Yamaue  ;  Masafumi Nakamura  ;  Masakazu Yamamoto  ;  Itaru Endo 
Citation
 LIVER CANCER, Vol.12(1) : 32-43, 2023-02 
Journal Title
LIVER CANCER
ISSN
 2235-1795 
Issue Date
2023-02
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Laparoscopic left hepatectomy ; Open left hepatectomy ; Overall survival ; Postoperative complications ; Recurrence-free survival
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the prognostic impact of laparoscopic left hepatectomy (LLH) with that of open left hepatectomy (OLH) on patient survival after resection of left hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Among the 953 patients who received initial treatment for primary HCC that was resectable by either LLH or OLH from 2013 to 2017 in Japan and Korea, 146 patients underwent LLH and 807 underwent OLH. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach based on propensity scoring was used to address the potential selection bias inherent in the recurrence and survival outcomes between the LLH and OLH groups.

Results: The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and hepatic decompensation was significantly lower in the LLH group than in the OLH group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was better in the LLH group than in the OLH group (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.71; p = 0.029), whereas overall survival (OS) was not significantly different. Subgroup analyses of RFS and OS revealed an almost consistent trend in favor of LLH over OLH. In patients with tumor sizes of ≥4.0 cm or those with single tumors, both RFS and OS were significantly better in the LLH group than in the OLH group.

Conclusions: LLH decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS in patients with primary HCC located in the left liver.
Files in This Item:
T202305410.pdf Download
DOI
10.1159/000527294
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Gi Hong(최기홍) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-3773
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196711
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links