0 373

Cited 0 times in

Cited 34 times in

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections An International Multicenter Study

Authors
 Goh, Brian K. P.  ;  Han, Ho-Seong  ;  Chen, Kuo-Hsin  ;  Chua, Darren W.  ;  Chan, Chung-Yip  ;  Cipriani, Federica  ;  Aghayan, Davit L.  ;  Fretland, Asmund A.  ;  Sijberden, Jasper  ;  D'Silva, Mizelle  ;  Siow, Tiing Foong  ;  Kato, Yutaro  ;  Lim, Chetana  ;  Nghia, Phan Phuoc  ;  Herman, Paulo  ;  Marino, Marco, V  ;  Mazzaferro, Vincenzo  ;  Chiow, Adrian K. H.  ;  Sucandy, Iswanto  ;  Ivanecz, Arpad  ;  Choi, Sung Hoon  ;  Lee, Jae Hoon  ;  Gastaca, Mikel  ;  Vivarelli, Marco  ;  Giuliante, Felice  ;  Ruzzenente, Andrea  ;  Yong, Chee-Chien  ;  Yin, Mengqui  ;  Chen, Zewei  ;  Fondevila, Constantino  ;  Efanov, Mikhail  ;  Rotellar, Fernando  ;  Choi, Gi Hong  ;  Campos, Ricardo R.  ;  Wang, Xiaoying  ;  Sutcliffe, Robert P.  ;  Pratschke, Johann  ;  Lai, Eric  ;  Chong, Charing C.  ;  D'Hondt, Mathieu  ;  Monden, Kazuteru  ;  Lopez-Ben, Santiago F.  ;  Coelho, Fabricio F.  ;  Kingham, Thomas Peter  ;  Liu, Rong  ;  Long, Tran Cong Duy  ;  Ferrero, Alessandro  ;  Sandri, Giovanni B. Levi  ;  Saleh, Mansour  ;  Cherqui, Daniel  ;  Scatton, Olivier  ;  Soubrane, Olivier  ;  Wakabayashi, Go I.  ;  Troisi, Roberto  ;  Cheung, Tan-To  ;  Sugioka, Atsushi  ;  Abu Hilal, Mohammad  ;  Fuks, David  ;  Edwin, Bjorn  ;  Aldrighetti, Luca 
Citation
 ANNALS OF SURGERY, Vol.277(4) : e839-e848, 2023-04 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ISSN
 0003-4932 
Issue Date
2023-04
Keywords
laparoscopic liver resection ; benchmark ; global ; hepatectomy ; minimally invasive ; quality assessment
Abstract
Objective:To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR). Background:There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR. Methods:This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. Results:There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss >= 500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions:This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005530
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Gi Hong(최기홍) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-3773
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196024
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links