41 111

Cited 7 times in

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study

Authors
 Yoon Jin Choi  ;  Dong Ho Lee  ;  Myung Gyu Choi  ;  Sung Joon Lee  ;  Sung Kook Kim  ;  Geun Am Song  ;  Poong Lyul Rhee  ;  Hwoon Yong Jung  ;  Dae Hwan Kang  ;  Yong Chan Lee  ;  Si Hyung Lee  ;  Suck Chei Choi  ;  Ki Nam Shim  ;  Sang Yong Seol  ;  Jeong Seop Moon  ;  Yong Woon Shin  ;  Hyun Soo Kim  ;  Soo Teik Lee  ;  Jin Woong Cho  ;  Eun Kwang Choi  ;  Oh Young Lee  ;  Jin Seok Jang 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, Vol.32(11) : 1807-1813, 2017-11 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
ISSN
 1011-8934 
Issue Date
2017-11
MeSH
Adult ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa / pathology ; Gastritis / drug therapy* ; Gastrointestinal Diseases / etiology ; Gastroscopy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plant Extracts / adverse effects ; Plant Extracts / therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Adverse Drug Event ; Artemisia ; Double-blind Study ; Endoscopy ; Gastritis
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.4% (95% confidence interval, -9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of -14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670).
Files in This Item:
T992017256.pdf Download
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1807
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Yong Chan(이용찬) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-6906
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195786
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links