0 126

Cited 1132 times in

MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy

Authors
 George W Sledge Jr  ;  Masakazu Toi  ;  Patrick Neven  ;  Joohyuk Sohn  ;  Kenichi Inoue  ;  Xavier Pivot  ;  Olga Burdaeva  ;  Meena Okera  ;  Norikazu Masuda  ;  Peter A Kaufman  ;  Han Koh  ;  Eva-Maria Grischke  ;  Martin Frenzel  ;  Yong Lin  ;  Susana Barriga  ;  Ian C Smith  ;  Nawel Bourayou  ;  Antonio Llombart-Cussac 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.35(25) : 2875-2884, 2017-09 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2017-09
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aminopyridines / administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use* ; Benzimidazoles / administration & dosage ; Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy* ; Breast Neoplasms / enzymology ; Breast Neoplasms / metabolism ; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 / antagonists & inhibitors ; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 / antagonists & inhibitors ; Disease-Free Survival ; Double-Blind Method ; Estradiol / administration & dosage ; Estradiol / analogs & derivatives ; Estradiol / therapeutic use ; Female ; Fulvestrant ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Receptor, ErbB-2 / biosynthesis ; Receptors, Estrogen / biosynthesis ; Receptors, Progesterone / biosynthesis
Abstract
Purpose MONARCH 2 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107703) compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, plus fulvestrant with fulvestrant alone in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods MONARCH 2 was a global, double-blind, phase III study of women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who had progressed while receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from the end of adjuvant ET, or while receiving first-line ET for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily) on a continuous schedule and fulvestrant (500 mg, per label). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and key secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Results Between August 2014 and December 2015, 669 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (n = 446) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 223). Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly extended PFS versus fulvestrant alone (median, 16.4 v 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.553; 95% CI, 0.449 to 0.681; P < .001). In patients with measurable disease, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant achieved an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI, 42.6% to 53.6%) compared with 21.3% (95% CI, 15.1% to 27.6%) in the control arm. The most common adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo arms were diarrhea (86.4% v 24.7%), neutropenia (46.0% v 4.0%), nausea (45.1% v 22.9%), and fatigue (39.9% v 26.9%). Conclusions Abemaciclib at 150 mg twice daily plus fulvestrant was effective, significantly improving PFS and ORR and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who progressed while receiving ET.
Full Text
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Sohn, Joo Hyuk(손주혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-2764
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195753
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links