0 102

Cited 51 times in

A randomized phase II trial of CRLX101 in combination with bevacizumab versus standard of care in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

Authors
 M.H. Voss  ;  A. Hussain  ;  N. Vogelzang  ;  J.L. Lee  ;  B. Keam  ;  S.Y. Rha  ;  U. Vaishampayan  ;  W.B. Harris  ;  S. Richey  ;  J.M. Randall  ;  D. Shaffer  ;  A. Cohn  ;  T. Crowell  ;  J. Li  ;  A. Senderowicz  ;  E. Stone  ;  R. Figlin  ;  R.J. Motzer  ;  N.B. Haas  ;  T. Hutson 
Citation
 ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, Vol.28(11) : 2754-2760, 2017-11 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0923-7534 
Issue Date
2017-11
Abstract
Background
Nanoparticle-drug conjugates enhance drug delivery to tumors. Gradual payload release inside cancer cells augments antitumor activity while reducing toxicity. CRLX101 is a novel nanoparticle–drug conjugate containing camptothecin, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I and the hypoxia-inducible factors 1α and 2α. In a phase Ib/2 trial, CRLX101 + bevacizumab was well tolerated with encouraging activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We conducted a randomized phase II trial comparing CRLX101 + bevacizumab versus standard of care (SOC) in refractory mRCC.

Patients and methods
Patients with mRCC and 2–3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 1:1 to CRLX101 + bevacizumab versus SOC, defined as investigator’s choice of any approved regimen not previously received. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiological review in patients with clear cell mRCC. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate and safety.

Results
In total, 111 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of drug (CRLX101 + bevacizumab, 55; SOC, 56). Within the SOC arm, patients received single-agent bevacizumab (19), axitinib (18), everolimus (7), pazopanib (4), sorafenib (4), sunitinib (2), or temsirolimus (2). In the clear cell population, the median PFS on the CRLX101 + bevacizumab and SOC arms was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval, 2.0–4.3) and 3.9 months (95% confidence interval 2.2–5.4), respectively (stratified log-rank P = 0.831). The objective response rate by IRR was 5% with CRLX101 + bevacizumab versus 14% with SOC (Mantel–Haenszel test, P = 0.836). Consistent with previous studies, the CRLX101 + bevacizumab combination was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signal was identified.

Conclusions
Despite promising efficacy data on the earlier phase Ib/2 trial of mRCC, this randomized trial did not demonstrate improvement in PFS for the CRLX101 + bevacizumab combination when compared with approved agents in patients with heavily pretreated clear cell mRCC. Further development in this disease is not planned.

Clinical trial identification
NCT02187302 (NIH).
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419346125
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdx493
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Sun Young(라선영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-4531
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195614
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links