55 133

Cited 0 times in

Comparison between three types of needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid masses: a multicenter observational study

Authors
 Min Jae Yang  ;  Jaihwan Kim  ;  Se Woo Park  ;  Jae Hee Cho  ;  Eui Joo Kim  ;  Yun Nah Lee  ;  Dong Wook Lee  ;  Chan Hyuk Park  ;  Sang Soo Lee 
Citation
 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, Vol.13(1) : 3677, 2023-03 
Journal Title
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Issue Date
2023-03
MeSH
Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Endosonography* ; Humans ; Needles* ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional
Abstract
It is debatable which needle has clear superiority of diagnostic performance in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic masses. This study aimed to compare the performance of three needles and determine the variables that affect diagnostic accuracy. From March 2014 to May 2020, 746 patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent EUS-FNB using three types of needles (Franseen needle, Menghini-tip needle, and Reverse-bevel needle) were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model was used to identify factors related to diagnostic accuracy. There were significant differences between the groups regarding the procurement rate of the histologic and optimal quality cores (Franseen vs. Menghini-tip vs. Reverse-bevel: 98.0% [192/196] vs. 85.8% [97/113] vs. 91.9% [331/360], P < 0.001 and 95.4% [187/196] vs. 65.5% [74/113] vs. 88.3% [318/360], P < 0.001, respectively). The sensitivity and accuracy using histologic samples were 95.03% and 95.92% for Franseen, 82.67% and 88.50% for Menghini-tip, and 82.61% and 85.56% for Reverse-bevel needles, respectively. In direct comparison between the needles using histologic samples, the Franseen needle showed significantly superior accuracy than the Menghini-tip (P = 0.018) and Reverse-bevel needles (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size ≥ 2 cm (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.40–8.47, P < 0.001) and fanning technique (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00–2.86, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with an accurate diagnosis. EUS-FNB using the Franseen needle enables the acquisition of a larger and more adequate histologic core tissue and achieves an accurate histological diagnosis when using the fanning technique. © 2023, The Author(s).
Files in This Item:
T202303328.pdf Download
DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-30920-5
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Jae Hee(조재희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-0091
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195472
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links