0 419

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Brain-computer interface-based action observation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation enhances corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects and stroke patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Min Gyu-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hyunmi-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, In Jun-
dc.contributor.authorKu, Jeonghun-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Youn Joo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-02T00:43:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-02T00:43:40Z-
dc.date.created2023-03-30-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.issn1741-2560-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/194376-
dc.description.abstractObjective. Action observation (AO) combined with brain-computer interface (BCI) technology enhances cortical activation. Peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) increases corticospinal excitability, thereby activating brain plasticity. To maximize motor recovery, we assessed the effects of BCI-AO combined with PES on corticospinal plasticity. Approach. Seventeen patients with chronic hemiplegic stroke and 17 healthy subjects were recruited. The participants watched a video of repetitive grasping actions with four different tasks for 15 min: (A) AO alone; (B) AO + PES; (C) BCI-AO + continuous PES; and (D) BCI-AO + triggered PES. PES was applied at the ulnar nerve of the wrist. The tasks were performed in a random order at least three days apart. We assessed the latency and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). We examined changes in MEP parameters pre-and post-exercise across the four tasks in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the dominant hand (healthy subjects) and affected hand (stroke patients). Main results. The decrease in MEP latency and increase in MEP amplitude after the four tasks were significant in both groups. The increase in MEP amplitude was sustained for 20 min after tasks B, C, and D in both groups. The increase in MEP amplitude was significant between tasks A vs. B, B vs. C, and C vs. D. The estimated mean difference in MEP amplitude post-exercise was the highest for A and D in both groups. Significance. The results indicate that BCI-AO combined with PES is superior to AO alone or AO + PES for facilitating corticospinal plasticity in both healthy subjects and patients with stroke. Furthermore, this study supports the idea that synchronized activation of cortical and peripheral networks can enhance neuroplasticity after stroke. We suggest that the BCI-AO paradigm and PES could provide a novel neurorehabilitation strategy for patients with stroke.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Pub.-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Neural Engineering-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleBrain-computer interface-based action observation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation enhances corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects and stroke patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentYonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Min Gyu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Hyunmi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, In Jun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKu, Jeonghun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKang, Youn Joo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1741-2552/ac76e0-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01618-
dc.identifier.eissn1741-2552-
dc.identifier.pmid35675795-
dc.subject.keywordbrain-computer interface-
dc.subject.keywordperipheral nerve electrical stimulation-
dc.subject.keywordaction observation-
dc.subject.keywordcortical excitability-
dc.subject.keywordmotor evoked potentials-
dc.subject.keywordrehabilitation-
dc.subject.keywordstroke-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85132454342-
dc.identifier.wosid000813319200001-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Neural Engineering, Vol.19(3), 2022-06-
dc.identifier.rimsid78237-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbrain-computer interface-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorperipheral nerve electrical stimulation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoraction observation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcortical excitability-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormotor evoked potentials-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrehabilitation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstroke-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMIRROR THERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMOTOR CORTEX-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNERVE STIMULATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPLASTICITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRECOVERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONSOLIDATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFACILITATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMAGERY-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Biomedical-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryNeurosciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNeurosciences & Neurology-
dc.identifier.articleno036039-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.