745 274

Cited 54 times in

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Authors
 Tae-Han Kim  ;  In-Ho Kim  ;  Seung Joo Kang  ;  Miyoung Choi  ;  Baek-Hui Kim  ;  Bang Wool Eom  ;  Bum Jun Kim  ;  Byung-Hoon Min  ;  Chang In Choi  ;  Cheol Min Shin  ;  Chung Hyun Tae  ;  Chung Sik Gong  ;  Dong Jin Kim  ;  Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho  ;  Eun Jeong Gong  ;  Geum Jong Song  ;  Hyeon-Su Im  ;  Hye Seong Ahn  ;  Hyun Lim  ;  Hyung-Don Kim  ;  Jae-Joon Kim  ;  Jeong Il Yu  ;  Jeong Won Lee  ;  Ji Yeon Park  ;  Jwa Hoon Kim  ;  Kyoung Doo Song  ;  Minkyu Jung  ;  Mi Ran Jung  ;  Sang-Yong Son  ;  Shin-Hoo Park  ;  Soo Jin Kim  ;  Sung Hak Lee  ;  Tae-Yong Kim  ;  Woo Kyun Bae  ;  Woong Sub Koom  ;  Yeseob Jee  ;  Yoo Min Kim  ;  Yoonjin Kwak  ;  Young Suk Park  ;  Hye Sook Han  ;  Su Youn Nam  ;  Seong-Ho Kong 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, Vol.23(1) : 3-106, 2023-01 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER
ISSN
 2093-582X 
Issue Date
2023-01
Keywords
Chemotherapy ; Endoscopy ; Guidelines ; Stomach neoplasms ; Surgery
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
Files in This Item:
T202302869.pdf Download
DOI
10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Koom, Woong Sub(금웅섭) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-7750
Kim, Yoo Min(김유민)
Jung, Min Kyu(정민규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-3387
Cho, Arthur Eung Hyuck(조응혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-2473
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/194290
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links