0 165

Cited 7 times in

Corticosteroids and Mesalamine Versus Corticosteroids for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors
 Shomron Ben-Horin  ;  Ofir Har-Noy  ;  Konstantinos H Katsanos  ;  Xavier Roblin  ;  Minhu Chen  ;  Xiang Gao  ;  Doron Schwartz  ;  Jae Hee Cheon  ;  Monica Cesarini  ;  Daniela Bojic  ;  Marijana Protic  ;  Angeliki Theodoropoulou  ;  Heba Abu-Kaf  ;  Tal Engel  ;  Jian Tang  ;  Pauline Veyrard  ;  Xiaoqing Lin  ;  Ren Mao  ;  Dimitrios Christodoulou  ;  Konstantinos Karmiris  ;  Tamara Knezevic-Ivanovski 
Citation
 CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Vol.20(12) : 2868-2875.e1, 2022-12 
Journal Title
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
ISSN
 1542-3565 
Issue Date
2022-12
MeSH
Adrenal Cortex Hormones / therapeutic use ; Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use ; Biological Products* / therapeutic use ; Colitis, Ulcerative* / chemically induced ; Colitis, Ulcerative* / drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Mesalamine / therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
5-Aminosalycilates ; Corticosteroids ; Inflammatory Bowel Disease ; Ulcerative Colitis
Abstract
Background & aims: Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for hospitalized patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, whether the addition/continuation of mesalamine with corticosteroids during hospitalization is superior to corticosteroids alone is unknown.

Methods: This was a randomized controlled, investigator-blinded, clinical trial conducted in 10 centers in 7 countries. Patients hospitalized with ASUC (Lichtiger score ≥10) were eligible. Patients received corticosteroids alone or corticosteroid + mesalamine (4 g/day mesalamine) by a stratified randomization according to mesalamine use before admission. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who responded to treatment by day 7, defined by a drop >3 points in the Lichtiger score and an absolute score <10 without the need for rescue medications or colectomy.

Results: Three hundred forty-six patients were screened, and 149 were included (70/149 female; median age, 41 years). Of these, 73 received corticosteroids + mesalamine, and 76 received corticosteroids alone. For the primary outcome, 53 of 73 patients (72.6%) receiving corticosteroids with mesalamine responded versus 58 of 76 patients (76.3%) on corticosteroids alone (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.72; P = .60). There was no difference between groups in duration of hospitalization, C-reactive protein normalization rate, or colectomy rate up to day 90. The need for biologics among patients receiving combination of corticosteroids with mesalamine was numerically lower by day 30 (P = .11) and day 90 (P = .07).

Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial, combination of mesalamine with corticosteroids did not benefit hospitalized patients with ASUC more than corticosteroids alone. An exploratory signal for a reduced need for biologics at 90 days in the mesalamine group merits further evaluation.

Clinicaltrials: gov ID: NCT01941589.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356522002130
DOI
10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.055
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cheon, Jae Hee(천재희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-8904
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193927
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links