0 339

Cited 2 times in

Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: A crossover clinical trial

Authors
 Duygu Karasan  ;  Irena Sailer  ;  Hyeonjong Lee  ;  Fatmanur Demir  ;  Cristina Zarauz  ;  Kivanc Akc 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, Vol.128 : 104365, 2023-01 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
ISSN
 0300-5712 
Issue Date
2023-01
MeSH
Computer-Aided Design ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dental Prosthesis Design* / methods ; Humans ; Occlusal Adjustment* ; Prospective Studies ; Workflow ; Zirconium
Keywords
Clinical research ; Complete digital workflow ; Effectiveness ; Fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) ; Model-free fabrication ; Monolithic zirconia ; Tooth-supported
Abstract
Aim: This prospective crossover clinical trial aimed to compare the complete-digital and -analog workflows in terms of occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, operator, and patient preferences.

Materials and method: This study included twelve patients receiving fourteen 3-unit posterior FDPs. 2 FDPs were made for each restoration site: one fabricated in complete-digital workflow comprising intraoral scan with static bite registration (Trios 3) and a monolithic zirconia FDP (test); the other fabricated in complete-analog workflow comprising conventional impression/face-bow transfer and a porcelain-fused-to-metal FDP (control). The FDPs (n=28) were intraorally/provisionally fixed, and quadrant-like intraoral scans were taken for every FDP before & after their occlusal adjustments. Pre- and post-adjustment scans of each FDP were then superimposed using best-fit alignment (GOM Inspect) to measure the volumetric occlusal adjustment amount (mm3) (3Matic) (Mann Whitney U, α=0.05). The patient and operator experience for digital and analog workflows were evaluated using visual analog scales (Wilcoxon test, α=0.05).

Results: Mean occlusal adjustments were 7.63 mm3 [±7.02] and 25.95 mm3 [±39.61] for test and control groups, respectively. The volumetric adjustment difference was clinically noticeable but not significant (P=0.12). The impression and digital workflow adjustment were perceived more favorably by both operator (P=0.003, P=0.046, respectively) and the patients (P=0.003, P=0.002, respectively).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, the complete digital workflow with digital static bite-registration provided high occlusal accuracy for short-span tooth-supported FDPs. In addition, the patient and operator preferences significantly favored the digital workflow.

Clinical significance: Complete-digital workflow employing intraoral scanning and model-free fabrication of monolithic-Zr short-span tooth-supported FDPs offers an effective treatment modality with sufficient occlusal accuracy. Therefore complete-digital workflow is a valid alternative for complete-analog workflow comprising conventional impression, face-bow transfer, and use of a semi-adjustable articulator.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571222004171?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104365
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Hyeonjong(이현종) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-2975
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193600
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links