266 363

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea

Authors
 Yoonjung Kim  ;  Inho Park  ;  Boyeon Kim  ;  Yu Jeong Choi  ;  Seoung Chul Oh  ;  Kyung-A Lee  
Citation
 ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, Vol.43(1) : 64-72, 2023-01 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
ISSN
 2234-3806 
Issue Date
2023-01
MeSH
Adult ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant* / diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant* / drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant* / genetics ; Recombinational DNA Repair
Keywords
Castration-resistant ; High-throughput nucleotide sequencing ; Illumina sequencing ; Ion Torrent sequencing ; Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors ; Prostatic neoplasms ; Recombinational DNA repair
Abstract
Background: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As locally adopted multigene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays for selecting PARP inhibitor candidates have not been thoroughly evaluated, we compared the analytical performance of the FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) (central laboratory) and other NGS assays (local laboratory) with samples from the PROfound trial in Korea.

Methods: One hundred PROfound samples (60 HRR mutation [HRRm] cases and 40 non-HRRm cases) were analyzed. The results of HRR gene mutation analysis were compared between the FoundationOne CDx and two other NGS assays [SureSelect Custom Design assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Oncomine Comprehensive assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)].

Results: The positive percent agreement for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (indels) between the central laboratory and local laboratory was 98.7%-100.0%. The negative percent agreement and overall percent agreement (OPA) for SNVs and indels between central and local laboratories were both 100%. Compared with that of the FoundationOne CDx assay, the OPA for copy number variations of the Oncomine Comprehensive and SureSelect Custom assays reached 99.8%-100%. Most mCRPC patients harboring a deleterious genetic variant were successfully identified with both local laboratory assays.

Conclusions: The NGS approach at a local laboratory showed comparable analytical performance for identifying HRRm status to the FoundationOne CDx assay used at the central laboratory.
Files in This Item:
T202203787.pdf Download
DOI
10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.64
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Boyeon(김보연)
Kim, Yoon Jung(김윤정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-4265
Park, Inho(박인호)
Lee, Kyung A(이경아) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5320-6705
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193500
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links