0 257

Cited 3 times in

Comparison of the efficacy between sequential therapy with teriparatide and denosumab and denosumab monotherapy in suppressing fragility fracture risk

Authors
 Jae-Won Shin  ;  Quen He  ;  Yong June Suk  ;  Sang-Ho Kim  ;  Hak-Sun Kim 
Citation
 OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, Vol.33(11) : 2409-2416, 2022-11 
Journal Title
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN
 0937-941X 
Issue Date
2022-11
MeSH
Bone Density ; Bone Density Conservation Agents* ; Denosumab / therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / chemically induced ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / complications ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / drug therapy ; Osteoporotic Fractures* / chemically induced ; Osteoporotic Fractures* / prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Teriparatide
Keywords
Anabolics ; Antiresorptive ; Bone mineral density ; Denosumab ; Osteoporosis ; Teriparatide
Abstract
In this retrospective study, the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing fragility fracture risk was determined in comparison with denosumab monotherapy. Administration of sequential teriparatide with denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk for fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.

Introduction: To determine the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing the risk of fragility fractures in comparison to denosumab monotherapy.

Methods: The data of postmenopausal patients treated with denosumab for > 2 years between August 2015 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred sixty four postmenopausal women of a total 615 were excluded, since they did not undergo > 2 bone mineral density (BMD) tests, were lost to follow-up, or received long-term teriparatide therapy. Total 320 patients received denosumab monotherapy and 131 patients received teriparatide for ≥ 3 months followed by denosumab. The number of osteoporotic fractures, presence of back pain before and after treatment, and annual BMD during treatment were comparatively assessed using t-test, Chi-square test, and linear mixed model analysis.

Results: Before treatment, the denosumab monotherapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures (mean ± standard deviation; 0.459 ± 0.689) than the sequential therapy group had (1.037 ± 0.871; p < 0.001). After treatment, the sequential therapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures than the denosumab monotherapy group had (0.119 ± 0.348 versus 0.144 ± 0.385; p < 0.001). At 1 and 2 years after treatment, the increase in lumbar spine BMD was greater in the sequential therapy group than in the denosumab monotherapy group (p = 0.08, group × time). The difference between post and pre-treatment back pain visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the sequential therapy group than in the monotherapy group (3.246 ± 3.426 versus 1.734 ± 3.049; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Short-term teriparatide use before denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk of fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-022-06495-8
DOI
10.1007/s00198-022-06495-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hak Sun(김학선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-4688
Shin, Jae Won(신재원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-6336
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193141
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links