0 202

Cited 0 times in

Efficacy and Safety of SID142 in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase III Clinical Trial

Authors
 Hyungdon Kook  ;  Cheol Woong Yu  ;  Donghoon Choi  ;  Tae Hoon Ahn  ;  Kiyuk Chang  ;  Jin-Man Cho  ;  Soo-Joong Kim  ;  Chang Gyu Park  ;  Deok-Kyu Cho  ;  Sang-Hyun Kim  ;  Han Cheol Lee  ;  Han-Young Jin  ;  In-Ho Chae  ;  Kihwan Kwon  ;  Sung Gyun Ahn  ;  Ju Han Kim  ;  Sang-Rok Lee  ;  Jeong-Su Kim  ;  Seok Yeon Kim  ;  Sang Wook Lim 
Citation
 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, Vol.44(4) : 508-528, 2022-04 
Journal Title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN
 0149-2918 
Issue Date
2022-04
MeSH
Cilostazol ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Pain ; Peripheral Arterial Disease* / diagnosis ; Peripheral Arterial Disease* / drug therapy ; Plant Extracts / adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Ginkgo biloba ; SID142 ; cilostazol ; peripheral arterial disease
Abstract
Purpose: Renexin® is a combination pill of cilostazol and Ginkgo biloba leaf extract that is used for the improvement of ischemic symptoms associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). SID142 is a controlled-release tablet of cilostazol (200 mg) and G biloba leaf extract (160 mg) that was developed to address the limitation of BID administration with Renexin. This study aimed to verify that SID142 was not inferior to Renexin in the treatment of patients with PAD.

Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, Phase III clinical trial. Study subjects were randomized to receive SID142 once daily or Renexin twice a day for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a change in the patient assessment of lower leg pain intensity with the use of a visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 weeks of treatment. If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI was greater than -10, the study drug was declared noninferior to the reference drug. Secondary efficacy end points included cold sensation, ankle-brachial index, ankle systolic pressure, maximum walking distance, pain-free walking distance, and investigator's global assessment. Study group results were compared 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment. Adverse events were assessed as a safety end point.

Findings: In total, 344 subjects from 19 medical centers were screened, and a total of 170 subjects were randomly assigned to either the SID142 (n = 86) or the Renexin (n = 84) group. Analysis of the change in lower extremity pain at 12 weeks compared with baseline revealed that SID142 was not inferior to Renexin (21.44 [19.23] vs 22.30 [17.75]; 95% CI, -7.70 to 5.97; P = 0.5942). No significant differences were found between groups in any secondary efficacy end point. However, the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the SID142 group (22.35% vs 39.29%; P = 0.0171).

Implications: SID142 once daily was not inferior to Renexin twice a day for efficacy in patients with PAD. SID142 had a favorable safety profile.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT03318276.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291822000467
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.016
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Deok Kyu(조덕규)
Choi, Dong Hoon(최동훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-9760
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192942
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links