0 318

Cited 10 times in

Comparison of visual results and optical quality of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: TECNIS symfony versus TECNIS synergy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김태임-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T05:05:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T05:05:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192305-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study compared the extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) (ZXR00; Tecnis® Symfony®, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and a new presbyopia-correcting IOL that combines EDOF and multifocal profiles (ZFR00; Tecnis® Synergy®, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) with the same material. Methods: The medical records of patients undergoing cataract surgery with ZXR00 or ZFR00 implantation between March 2021 and July 2021 and with the data available for the 3-month visit were reviewed. The uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance visual acuity (VA), corrected distance VA, defocus curves, refractive errors (RE), optical quality parameters, and patient-reported visual performance parameters were the main outcome measures. Results: Among the twenty-three enrolled patients, twelve patients (21 eyes) received ZXR00 and nine patients (17 eyes) received ZFR00. The mean age of the patients was 59.6 ± 10.6 (range: 49 to 70) and 65.2 ± 8.2 (range: 45 to 82) years in ZXR00 and ZFR00 groups, respectively, without significant difference. There was not a significant difference between the two groups in terms of baseline parameters and postoperative RE. The ZFR00 group showed markedly superior intermediate and near VA (p < 0.001 for all) at 3 months postoperatively. In terms of optical quality, ZXR00 was significantly better than ZFR00 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both IOLs had comparable distance VA. ZFR00 IOL was superior for intermediate and near visual acuity, but ZXR00 IOL was better for optical quality. Research with more participants is needed to support this finding.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWichtig-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCataract Extraction*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLens Implantation, Intraocular-
dc.subject.MESHLenses, Intraocular*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.MESHPhacoemulsification*-
dc.subject.MESHPresbyopia* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRefraction, Ocular-
dc.subject.MESHRefractive Errors*-
dc.subject.MESHVisual Acuity-
dc.titleComparison of visual results and optical quality of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: TECNIS symfony versus TECNIS synergy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDa Eun Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae-Im Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyungmin Koh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/11206721221093024-
dc.contributor.localIdA01080-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02991-
dc.identifier.eissn1724-6016-
dc.identifier.pmid35410507-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11206721221093024?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&-
dc.subject.keywordDefocus curve-
dc.subject.keywordextended depth of focus-
dc.subject.keywordextended range of vision-
dc.subject.keywordpresbyopia-
dc.subject.keywordpresbyopia-correcting intraocular lens-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Tae Im-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김태임-
dc.citation.volume32-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage3461-
dc.citation.endPage3469-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, Vol.32(6) : 3461-3469, 2022-11-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.