256 609

Cited 0 times in

Cited 12 times in

Biomechanical effect of anatomical tibial component design on load distribution of medial proximal tibial bone in total knee arthroplasty : finite element analysis indicating anatomical design prevents stress-shielding

Authors
 Cho, B.W.  ;  Kang, K.-T.  ;  Kwon, H.M.  ;  Lee, W.-S.,  ;  Yang, I.H.  ;  Nam, J.H.  ;  Koh, Y.-G.  ;  Park, Kwan Kyu 
Citation
 Bone and Joint Research, Vol.11(5) : 252-259, 2022-05 
Journal Title
 Bone and Joint Research 
ISSN
 2046-3758 
Issue Date
2022-05
Keywords
Anatomical tibial component ; Finite element analysis ; Medial proximal tibial bone loss ; Stress-shielding ; Total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Aims This study aimed to identify the effect of anatomical tibial component (ATC) design on load distribution in the periprosthetic tibial bone of Koreans using finite element analysis (FEA). Methods 3D finite element models of 30 tibiae in Korean women were created. A symmetric tibial component (STC, NexGen LPS-Flex) and an ATC (Persona) were used in surgical simulation. We compared the FEA measurements (von Mises stress and principal strains) around the stem tip and in the medial half of the proximal tibial bone, as well as the distance from the distal stem tip to the shortest anteromedial cortical bone. Correlations between this distance and FEA measurements were then analyzed. Results The distance from the distal stem tip to the shortest cortical bone showed no statistically significant difference between implants. However, the peak von Mises stress around the distal stem tip was higher with STC than with ATC. In the medial half of the proximal tibial bone: 1) the mean von Mises stress, maximum principal strain, and minimum principal strain were higher with ATC; 2) ATC showed a positive correlation between the distance and mean von Mises stress; 3) ATC showed a negative correlation between the distance and mean minimum principal strain; and 4) STC showed no correlation between the distance and mean measurements. Conclusion Implant design affects the load distribution on the periprosthetic tibial bone, and ATC can be more advantageous in preventing stress-shielding than STC. However, under certain circumstances with short distances, the advantage of ATC may be offset. © 2022 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. All rights reserved.
DOI
10.1302/2046-3758.115.BJR-2021-0537.R1
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, Hyuck Min(권혁민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-280X
Park, Kwan Kyu(박관규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-3257
Yang, Ick Hwan(양익환)
Lee, Woo Suk(이우석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-1660
Cho, Byung Woo(조병우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7472-4103
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191379
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links