0 8

Cited 0 times in

A pilot study comparing three bend angles for lighted stylet intubation

Authors
 Dongwook Won  ;  Jung-Man Lee  ;  Jiwon Lee  ;  Jin-Young Hwang  ;  Tae Kyong Kim  ;  Jee-Eun Chang  ;  Hyerim Kim  ;  Seoyoung Ma  ;  Seong-Won Min 
Citation
 BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, Vol.21(1) : 148, 2021-05 
Journal Title
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Issue Date
2021-05
MeSH
Aged ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal / instrumentation* ; Intubation, Intratracheal / methods* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies
Keywords
Lighted stylet ; Postoperative sore throat ; Tracheal intubation
Abstract
Background: For successful lighted stylet intubation, bending the lighted stylet with an appropriate angle is a prerequisite. The purpose of this study was to compare three different bend angles of 70, 80, and 90 degrees for lighted stylet intubation.

Methods: The patient trachea was intubated with a lighted stylet bent at 70, 80, or 90 degrees according to the randomly allocated groups (group I, II, and III, respectively). A lighted stylet combined with a tracheal tube was prepared with a bend angle of 70, 80, or 90 degrees according to the assigned group. We checked the success rate at the first attempt and overall success rate for the two attempts. Additionally, we measured search time, which was time from insertion of the bent union into the patient mouth to the start of advancing the tracheal tube while separating it from the lighted stylet, and evaluated postoperative sore throat (POST) at 2, 4, and 24 h after the recovery from anesthesia.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between group I, II, and III for success rate at first attempt (73.9 %, 88.2 %, and 94.7 %, respectively, p = 0.178), even though there was a trend of increasing success rate with increasing bend angles. For overall success rate, there was similar result to that in the first attempt between the groups I, II, and III (82.6 %, 94.1 %, and 100 %, respectively, p = 0.141). However, search time took significantly longer in group I than groups II and III (p < 0.001). When group II and III were compared for POST with numeric rating scale (0-10), it was significantly lower in group II than III at 2, 4 h after the recovery (0.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.016, and 0.4 vs. 1.8, p = 0.011, respectively).

Conclusions: The bend angle of the lighted stylet affected the time required for tracheal intubation and POST in our study. 80 and 90 degrees as a bend angle seem to be acceptable for clinicians in regard to success rate of lighted stylet intubation. Considering the success rate of lighted stylet intubation and POST, the bend angle of 80 degrees might be better than 70 and 90 degrees.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03693235 , registered on 30 September 2018.
DOI
10.1186/s12871-021-01369-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Jiwon(이지원)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190938
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links