0 476

Cited 0 times in

Cited 24 times in

Implants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNaenni, Nadja-
dc.contributor.authorStucki, Lukas-
dc.contributor.authorHusler, Jurg-
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, David-
dc.contributor.authorHammerle, Christoph H. F.-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ronald E.-
dc.contributor.authorThoma, Daniel S.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T00:37:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T00:37:26Z-
dc.date.created2022-04-28-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190825-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To assess clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as the profilometric contour alterations of peri-implant hard and soft tissues around single implants treated with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) at 5 years. Materials and Methods Twenty-seven patients presenting with a single tooth gap in the esthetic zone received a two-piece implant. GBR was randomly performed using a resorbable (RES) or a non-resorbable membrane (N-RES) combined with a bone substitute material. Follow-up examinations were performed at baseline (BL = crown insertion), 1 year (FU-1), 3 years (FU-3), and at 5 years (FU-5) including clinical and radiographic parameters as well as profilometric changes. Statistics were performed by means of parametric and nonparametric tests. Results At 5 years, 20 out of 27 patients (9 RES, 11 N-RES) were re-examined. Median values for probing depth changed insignificantly between BL and FU-5 in both groups. The median marginal bone levels were located 0.23 mm (0.06; 0.46; RES) and 0.17 mm (0.13;0.28; N-RES) below the implant shoulder at FU-5 (changes over time p < .05). The calculated median profilometric change between BL and FU-5 was -0.28 mm (-0.53;-0.20; RES; p = .016) and -0.24 mm (-0.43;0.08; N-RES; p = .102; intergroup p = .380). The horizontal bone thickness decreased significantly between re-entry and FU-5 for group RES at all measured levels (p < .05) measuring 0.87 mm (0.0; 2.05) at the implant shoulder, whereas the decrease for group N-RES was insignificant (p = .031) with 0 mm (0; 0.84) at the implant shoulder at 5 years. Conclusions Implants sites with concomitant GBR using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane revealed stable marginal bone levels and clinical outcomes. Profilometric changes were clinically negligible over 5 years. The observed change in hard tissue thickness was partially compensated by an increase in soft tissue thickness.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc.-
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical Oral Implants Research-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleImplants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Periodontics (치주과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNaenni, Nadja-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStucki, Lukas-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHusler, Jurg-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSchneider, David-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHammerle, Christoph H. F.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung, Ronald E.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorThoma, Daniel S.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13764-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00600-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0501-
dc.subject.keywordalveolar ridge augmentation-
dc.subject.keyworddental implants-
dc.subject.keywordmembranes-
dc.subject.keywordvolume stability-
dc.subject.keywordvolumetric analysis-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorThoma, Daniel S.-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85106707326-
dc.identifier.wosid000657818500001-
dc.citation.volume32-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage893-
dc.citation.endPage904-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationClinical Oral Implants Research, Vol.32(8) : 893-904, 2021-08-
dc.identifier.rimsid73647-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoralveolar ridge augmentation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordental implants-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormembranes-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorvolume stability-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorvolumetric analysis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIFFERENT GBR MATERIALS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVOLUME STABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWOUND CLOSURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPLACEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEFFICACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEFECTS-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Biomedical-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
Appears in Collections:
7. Others (기타) > Others (기타) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.