0 89

Cited 0 times in

Epidural grid, a new methodology of invasive intracranial EEG monitoring: A technical note and experience of a single center

Authors
 So Hee Park  ;  In-Ho Jung  ;  Kyung Won Chang  ;  Maeng Keun Oh  ;  Jin Woo Chang  ;  Se Hee Kim  ;  Hoon-Chul Kang  ;  Heung Dong Kim  ;  Won Seok Chang 
Citation
 EPILEPSY RESEARCH, Vol.182 : 106912, 2022-05 
Journal Title
EPILEPSY RESEARCH
ISSN
 0920-1211 
Issue Date
2022-05
MeSH
Electrocorticography* ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Electroencephalography* / methods ; Humans ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Subdural Space
Keywords
Electrocorticography ; Electrodes ; Epilepsy ; Neurosurgical procedures
Abstract
Introduction: Subdural grid monitoring (SDG) has the advantage to provide continuous coverage over a larger area of cortex, direct visualization of electrode location and functional mapping. However, SDG can cause direct irritation of the cortex or postoperative headaches due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Epidural grid monitoring (EDG) without opening the dura is thought to reduce the possibility of these complications. We report our experience with EDG.

Methods: We described our surgical technique of EDG in invasive intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) monitoring. A retrospective review of 30 patients who underwent grid placement of iEEG between March 2019 and December 2020 was performed to compare SDG and EDG.

Results: Of the 30 patients, 10 patients underwent SDG and 20 patients underwent EDG. There was no difference in age between SDG and EDG groups (p = 0.13). Also, there was no difference in the number of grid electrodes, craniotomy size, number of electrodes per craniotomy area and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.32, 0.84, 0.58 and 0.40). However, the maximum number of electrodes that have been undermined from the bone margin was much higher in SDG group (SDG 4.6 ± 2.2 vs. EDG 2.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.001). The demand for postoperative analgesics was significantly lower in EDG group (SDG 13.4 ± 9.1 vs. EDG 4.1 ± 4.3; p = 0.012); and the demand for postoperative antiemetics also tended to be low (SDG 4.6 ± 3.6 vs. EDG 1.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.078).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in craniotomy and electrode insertion between the two groups; however, the EDG group showed less postoperative headache and nausea. Though not in direct contact with the cortex, the quality of the electrophysiological signal received through the electrode in EDG is comparable to that of the SDG. The EDG enables to detect the onset of seizure and delineate the epileptogenic zone sufficiently. Moreover, functional mapping is possible with EDG. Therefore, EDG has the sufficient potential to replace SDG for monitoring of the lateral surface of brain.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121122000638?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106912
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pediatrics (소아과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Hoon Chul(강훈철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-8847
Kim, Se Hee(김세희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-1942
Kim, Heung Dong(김흥동) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-7336
Park, So Hee(박소희)
Chang, Kyung Won(장경원)
Chang, Won Seok(장원석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-4016
Chang, Jin Woo(장진우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-0101
Jung, In-Ho(정인호)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/188637
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links