0 31

Cited 0 times in

International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM-HBP surgery project

Authors
 Yuichi Nagakawa  ;  Kohei Nakata  ;  Hitoe Nishino  ;  Takao Ohtsuka  ;  Daisuke Ban  ;  Horacio J Asbun  ;  Ugo Boggi  ;  Jin He  ;  Michael L Kendrick  ;  Chinnusamy Palanivelu  ;  Rong Liu  ;  Shin-E Wang  ;  Chung-Ngai Tang  ;  Kyoichi Takaori  ;  Mohammed Abu Hilal  ;  Brian K P Goh  ;  Goro Honda  ;  Jin-Young Jang  ;  Chang Moo Kang  ;  David A Kooby  ;  Yoshiharu Nakamura  ;  Shailesh V Shrikhande  ;  Christopher L Wolfgang  ;  Anusak Yiengpruksawan  ;  Yoo-Seok Yoon  ;  Yusuke Watanabe  ;  Shingo Kozono  ;  Ruben Ciria  ;  Giammauro Berardi  ;  Giovanni Maria Garbarino  ;  Ryota Higuchi  ;  Naoki Ikenaga  ;  Yoshiya Ishikawa  ;  Aya Maekawa  ;  Yoshiki Murase  ;  Giuseppe Zimmitti  ;  Filipe Kunzler  ;  Zi-Zheng Wang  ;  Leon Sakuma  ;  Chie Takishita  ;  Hiroaki Osakabe  ;  Itaru Endo  ;  Masao Tanaka  ;  Hiroki Yamaue  ;  Minoru Tanabe  ;  Go Wakabayashi  ;  Akihiko Tsuchida  ;  Masafumi Nakamura 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, Vol.29(1) : 124-135, 2022-01 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES
ISSN
 1868-6974 
Issue Date
2022-01
MeSH
Humans ; Mesenteric Artery, Superior ; Mesenteric Veins* ; Pancreas ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy* ; Portal Vein / surgery
Keywords
consensus ; minimally invasive surgical procedures ; pancreatoduodenectomy ; robotic surgery ; superior mesenteric artery
Abstract
Background: The anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD.

Methods: Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.

Results: Three clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection.

Conclusions: MIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.1081
DOI
10.1002/jhbp.1081
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Chang Moo(강창무) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/188311
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links