0 80

Cited 0 times in

Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations

Authors
 Ryan Jin-Young Kim  ;  Goran I Benic  ;  Ji-Man Park 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, Vol.126(6) : 779-786, 2021-12 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
ISSN
 0022-3913 
Issue Date
2021-12
MeSH
Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Arch ; Dental Impression Technique* ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Models, Dental*
Abstract
Statement of problem: Studies evaluating the trueness of intraoral scanners (IOSs) at anatomic locations within an intracoronal preparation are lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness of digital scans obtained by IOSs at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.

Material and methods: Six IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, E4D, FastScan, iTero, TRIOS, Zfx IntraScan) were used to obtain digital scans of various intracoronal preparations. Standard tessellation language (STL) data sets obtained from a reference scanner and each IOS were superimposed, and the deviation of the digital casts was assessed at multiple measuring points along the margin and intaglio surfaces of each preparation. The Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple Mann-Whitney tests were used to detect differences in trueness (α=.05).

Results: The overall median trueness values were lowest for TRIOS (23.9 μm), followed by Zfx IntraScan (24.6 μm), iTero (25.4 μm), FastScan (26.1 μm), CEREC Omnicam (26.9 μm), and E4D (77.5 μm). The greatest deviation was generally observed at the line angles between the preparation surfaces. The axiogingival line angle was the most error-prone location in the cavity preparations. An increased tendency to produce a more accurate impression was observed when the cavity had a greater width and more divergent walls.

Conclusions: The trueness of digital scans was influenced by the type of IOS and the location within a prepared cavity. The trueness decreased at the line angles between the preparation surfaces, particularly at the axiogingival line angle. Among the tested IOSs, E4D produced the least accurate digital scans.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391320305084?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.019
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Ji-Man(박지만) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0018-1166
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187760
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links