709 461

Cited 35 times in

Cited 34 times in

Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions

Authors
 de Pablo, Gonzalo Salazar  ;  Solmi, Marco  ;  Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio  ;  Radua, Joaquim  ;  Passina, Anastassia  ;  Mosillo, Pierluca  ;  Correll, Christoph U.  ;  Borgwardt, Stefan  ;  Galderisi, Silvana  ;  Bechdolf, Andreas  ;  Pfennig, Andrea  ;  Bauer, Michael  ;  Kessing, Lars Vedel  ;  van Amelsvoort, Therese  ;  Nieman, Dorien H.  ;  Domschke, Katharina  ;  Krebs, Marie-Odile  ;  Sand, Michael  ;  Vieta, Eduard  ;  McGuire, Philip  ;  Arango, Celso  ;  Shin, Jae Il  ;  Fusar-Poli, Paolo 
Citation
 Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol.294 : 957-970, 2021-11 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
ISSN
 0165-0327 
Issue Date
2021-11
Keywords
Depression ; Prevention ; Evidence ; Prediction ; Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Primary prevention has the potential to modify the course of depression, but the consistency and magnitude of this effect are currently undetermined. Methods: PRISMA and RIGHT compliant (PROSPERO:CRD42020179659) systematic meta-review, PubMed/ Web of Science, up to June 2020. Meta-analyses of controlled interventions for the primary prevention of depressive symptoms [effect measures: standardized mean difference (SMD)] or depressive disorders [effect measure: relative risk (RR)] were carried out. Results were stratified by: (i) age range; (ii) target population (general and/or at-risk); (iii) intervention type. Quality (assessed with AMSTAR/AMSTAR-PLUS content) and credibility (graded as high/moderate/low) were assessed. USPSTF grading system was used for recommendations. Results: Forty-six meta-analyses (k=928 individual studies, n=286,429 individuals, mean age=22.4 years, 81.1% female) were included. Effect sizes were: SMD=0.08-0.53; for depressive symptoms; RR=0.90-0.28 for depressive disorders. Sensitivity analyses including only RCTs did not impact the findings. AMSTAR median=9 (IQR=8-9); AMSTAR-PLUS content median=4.25 (IQR=4-5). Credibility of the evidence was insufficient/low in 43 (93.5%) meta-analyses, moderate in two (4.3%), and high in one (2.2%): reduction of depressive symptoms using psychosocial interventions for young adults only, and a combination of psychological and educational interventions in primary care had moderate credibility; preventive administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in individuals with a stroke had high credibility. Limitations: Intervention heterogeneity and lack of long-term efficacy evaluation. Conclusions: Primary preventive interventions for depression might be effective. Among them, clinicians may offer SSRIs post-stroke to prevent depressive disorders, and psychosocial interventions for children/adolescents/ young adults with risk factors or during the prenatal/perinatal period.
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.101
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pediatrics (소아과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Jae Il(신재일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-1820
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187481
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links