Cited 0 times in
Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이주희 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-19T01:36:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-19T01:36:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/185940 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Clinical reasoning is a vital competency for healthcare providers. In 2014, a clinical reasoning assessment rubric (CRAR) composed of analysis, heuristics, inference, information processing, logic, cognition and meta-cognition subdomains was developed for osteopathy students. Methods: This study was conducted to verify the validity and reliability of the CRAR in nursing education. A total of 202 case vignette assessments completed by 68 students were used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the CRAR was calculated. Results: The content validity indices ranged from 0.57 to 1.0. The EFA resulted in three factors: assessment in nursing, nursing diagnosis and planning, and cognition/meta-cognition in nursing. The CFA supported a 3-factor model. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the CRAR was 0.94. This study confirmed the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the CRAR. Therefore, the CRAR is a useful rubric for assessing clinical reasoning in nursing students. Conclusions: The CRAR is a standardized rubric for assessing clinical reasoning in nurses. This scale will be useful for the development of educational programs for improving clinical reasoning in nursing education. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | BMC NURSING | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.title | Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Nursing (간호대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Nursing (간호학과) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | JuHee Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chang Gi Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Sung Hae Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Juyeon Bae | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12912-021-00695-z | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03172 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J03996 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1472-6955 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34551737 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Clinical reasoning | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Nursing education. Validity | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Psychometric evaluation | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Reliability | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Rubric | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Ju Hee | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이주희 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 177 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | BMC NURSING, Vol.20(1) : 177, 2021-09 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.