226 310

Cited 6 times in

Diagnostic model for pancreatic cancer using a multi-biomarker panel

Authors
 Yoo Jin Choi  ;  Woongchang Yoon  ;  Areum Lee  ;  Youngmin Han  ;  Yoonhyeong Byun  ;  Jae Seung Kang  ;  Hongbeom Kim  ;  Wooil Kwon  ;  Young-Ah Suh  ;  Yongkang Kim  ;  Seungyeoun Lee  ;  Junghyun Namkung  ;  Sangjo Han  ;  Yonghwan Choi  ;  Jin Seok Heo  ;  Joon Oh Park  ;  Joo Kyung Park  ;  Song Cheol Kim  ;  Chang Moo Kang  ;  Woo Jin Lee  ;  Taesung Park  ;  Jin-Young Jang 
Citation
 ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, Vol.100(3) : 144-153, 2021-03 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH
ISSN
 2288-6575 
Issue Date
2021-03
Keywords
Biomarkers ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Pancreatic intraductal neoplasms
Abstract
Purpose: Diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been used for early detection to reduce its dismal survival rate. However, clinically feasible biomarkers are still rare. Therefore, in this study, we developed an automated multi-marker enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit using 3 biomarkers (leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein [LRG1], transthyretin [TTR], and CA 19-9) that were previously discovered and proposed a diagnostic model for PDAC based on this kit for clinical usage.

Methods: Individual LRG1, TTR, and CA 19-9 panels were combined into a single automated ELISA panel and tested on 728 plasma samples, including PDAC (n = 381) and normal samples (n = 347). The consistency between individual panels of 3 biomarkers and the automated multi-panel ELISA kit were accessed by correlation. The diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression according to the automated ELISA kit to predict the risk of pancreatic cancer (high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups).

Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient of predicted values between the triple-marker automated ELISA panel and the former individual ELISA was 0.865. The proposed model provided reliable prediction results with a positive predictive value of 92.05%, negative predictive value of 90.69%, specificity of 90.69%, and sensitivity of 92.05%, which all simultaneously exceed 90% cutoff value.

Conclusion: This diagnostic model based on the triple ELISA kit showed better diagnostic performance than previous markers for PDAC. In the future, it needs external validation to be used in the clinic.
Files in This Item:
T202104147.pdf Download
DOI
10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.144
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Chang Moo(강창무) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/185449
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links