337 434

Cited 0 times in

진행성 전립선암의 치료: 국내 전립선암 전문가로 구성된 Prostate Cancer Summit (PCAS) 2016을 통한 전립선암 치료 지침의 확인

Other Titles
 Management of Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer: Establishment of Treatment Guidelines Through Prostate Cancer Summit (PCAS) 2016 Composed of Korean Prostate Cancer Experts 
Authors
 장춘태  ;  김형준  ;  김명기  ;  박성우  ;  박승철  ;  박재영  ;  이동현  ;  이승환  ;  전황균  ;  정재훈  ;  정현  ;  조문기  ;  홍성후  ;  곽철  ;  이지열  ;  권동득  ;  김청수  ;  전성수 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Urological Oncology, Vol.18(2) : 124-139, 2020-08 
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Urological Oncology(대한비뇨기종양학술지)
ISSN
 2234-4977 
Issue Date
2020-08
Keywords
Advenced prostate cancer ; CRPC ; PCAS2016 ; APCCC2015
Abstract
Purpose: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015 was based on topics with
controversy in the field of advanced prostate cancer. To understand the Korean urologists perspective regarding
the issues, we have conducted a questionnaire named Prostate Cancer Summit (PCAS) 2016, with 9 important
subtopics
Materials and Methods: Total 9 subtopics have been decided and questions were developed regarding each
subtopic. The questions were based on that of APCCC 2015 and translated into Korean for better understanding.
Total 51 panelists have voted online on 85 different questions.
Results: The survey concluded that testosterone should be measured as a diagnostic criterion for castration
resistance prostate cancer (CRPC) and that consensus was reached on issues such as the use of androgen
receptor pathway inhibitors in the treatment of predocetaxel and postdocetaxel in CRPC patients. In addition,
76% of the participants agreed that imaging tests were needed before new treatment in CRPC patients, and
a majority of participants agreed that periodic imaging tests are necessary regardless of symptoms during treatment
for CRPC. However, some issues, such as the use of prostate-specific antigen-based triggers for remediation
in CRPC patients, the endocrine manipulation in nonmetastatic CRPC patients, and the onset of treatment in
asymptomatic metastatic CRPC patients, were not agreed.
Conclusions: The results from PCAS 2016 has addressed some of the issues with controversy. Although the
voting results are subjective, it will help guide treatment decisions in topics with less evidence.
Files in This Item:
T999202337.pdf Download
DOI
10.22465/kjuo.2020.18.2.124
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Seung Hwan(이승환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-8544
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/185020
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links