0 326

Cited 4 times in

Wound healing adverse events in kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure or current standard-of-care: insights from the 24-month TRANSFORM study

Authors
 Franco Citterio  ;  Mitchell Henry  ;  Dean Y Kim  ;  Myoung Soo Kim  ;  Duck-Jong Han  ;  Takashi Kenmochi  ;  Eytan Mor  ;  Giuseppe Tisone  ;  Peter Bernhardt  ;  Maria Pilar Hernandez Gutierrez  ;  Yoshihiko Watarai 
Citation
 EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, Vol.19(10) : 1339-1348, 2020-10 
Journal Title
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
ISSN
 1474-0338 
Issue Date
2020-10
MeSH
Adult ; Calcineurin Inhibitors / administration & dosage ; Calcineurin Inhibitors / adverse effects* ; Everolimus / administration & dosage ; Everolimus / adverse effects* ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents / administration & dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents / adverse effects* ; Incidence ; Kidney Transplantation ; Lymphocele / epidemiology ; Lymphocele / etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid / administration & dosage ; Mycophenolic Acid / adverse effects ; Risk ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence / epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence / etiology ; Wound Healing / drug effects*
Keywords
Calcineurin inhibitor ; everolimus ; kidney transplantation ; randomized ; safety ; wound healing
Abstract
Objectives: In TRANSFORM, de novo kidney transplant recipients received either everolimus in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) at standard EVR pre-dose concentrations of 3-8 ng/mL or mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI). The authors analyzed the incidence of wound healing adverse events (WHAEs) over the 2-year study period 15.

Methods: Patients were randomized to either EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, both combined with induction therapy and steroids 19.

Results: The safety population consisted of 2,026 patients (EVR+rCNI: 1,014, MPA+sCNI: 1,012). The proportion of patients with at least 1 WHAE was comparable between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI treatment groups [20.6% vs. 17.3%; risk ratio (RR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.43] at month 24. The numerical difference between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI was mainly caused by an increased proportion of EVR patients with lymphocele and wound dehiscence [7.5% vs. 5.1% (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.05) and 3.9% vs. 1.8% (RR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.28, 3.84), respectively] 20.

Conclusion: The immediate introduction of EVR+rCNI after kidney transplantation was associated with an overall comparable incidence of WHAEs versus current standard-of-care over the 24-month study period. There was an increased relative risk of experiencing lymphocele and wound dehiscence but the absolute risks were rather low in both groups 21.

Ct.gov identifier: NCT01950819.
Full Text
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14740338.2020.1792441
DOI
10.1080/14740338.2020.1792441
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Myoung Soo(김명수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-8381
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/185010
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links