Myocardial infarction evaluation from stopping time decision toward interoperable algorithmic states in reinforcement learning

Abstract

Background: The Elliot wave principle commonly characterizes the impulsive and corrective wave trends for both financial market trends and electrocardiograms. The impulsive wave trends of electrocardiograms can annotate several wave components of heart-beats including pathological heartbeat waveforms. The stopping time inquires which ordinal element satisfies the assumed mathematical condition within a numerical set. The proposed work constitutes several algorithmic states in reinforcement learning from the stopping time decision, which determines the impulsive wave trends. Each proposed algorithmic state is applicable to any relevant algorithmic state in reinforcement learning with fully numerical explanations. Because commercial electrocardiographs still misinterpret myocardial infarctions from extraordinary electrocardiograms, a novel algorithm needs to be developed to evaluate myocardial infarctions. Moreover, differential diagnosis for right ventricle infarction is required to contraindicate a medication such as nitroglycerin.

Methods: The proposed work implements the stopping time theory to impulsive wave trend distribution. The searching process of the stopping time theory is equivalent to the actions toward algorithmic states in reinforcement learning. The state value from each algorithmic state represents the numerically deterministic annotated results from the impulsive wave trend distribution. The shape of the impulsive waveform is evaluated from the interoperable algorithmic states via least-first-power approximation and approximate entropy. The annotated electrocardiograms from the impulsive wave trend distribution utilize a structure of neural networks to approximate the isoelectric baseline amplitude value of the electrocardiograms, and detect the conditions of myocardial infarction. The annotated results from the impulsive wave trend distribution consist of another reinforcement learning environment for the evaluation of impulsive waveform direction.

Results: The accuracy to discern myocardial infarction was found to be 99.2754% for the data from the comma-separated value format files, and 99.3579% for those containing representative beats. The clinical dataset included 276 electrocardiograms from the comma-separated value files and 623 representative beats.

Conclusions: Our study aims to support clinical interpretation on 12-channel electrocardiograms. The proposed work is suitable for a differential diagnosis under infarction in the right ventricle to avoid contraindicated medication during emergency. An impulsive waveform that is affected by myocardial infarction or the electrical direction of electrocardiography is represented as an inverse waveform.