232 344

Cited 0 times in

Cited 89 times in

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: Use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population

Authors
 Nielsen, J.C.  ;  Lin, Y.-J.  ;  de, Oliveira Figueiredo M.J.  ;  Shamloo, A.S.  ;  Alfie, A.  ;  Boveda, S.  ;  Dagres, N.  ;  Di, Toro D.  ;  Eckhardt, L.L.  ;  Ellenbogen, K.  ;  Hardy, C.  ;  Ikeda, T.  ;  Jaswal, A.  ;  Kaufman, E.  ;  Krahn, A.  ;  Kusano, K.  ;  Kutyifa, V.  ;  Lim, H.S.  ;  Lip, G.Y.H.  ;  Nava-Townsend, S.  ;  Pak, Hui-Nam  ;  Diez, G.R.  ;  Sauer, W.  ;  Saxena, A.  ;  Svendsen, J.H.  ;  Vanegas, D.  ;  Vaseghi, M.  ;  Wilde, A.  ;  Jared, Bunch T.  ;  Buxton, A.E.  ;  Calvimontes, G.  ;  Chao, T.-F.  ;  Eckardt, L.  ;  Estner, H.  ;  Gillis, A.M.  ;  Isa, R.  ;  Kautzner, J.  ;  Maury, P.  ;  Moss, J.D.  ;  Nam, G.-B.  ;  Olshansky, B.  ;  Pava, Molano L.F.  ;  Pimentel, M.  ;  Prabhu, M.  ;  Tzou, W.S.  ;  Sommer, P.  ;  Swampillai, J.  ;  Vidal, A.  ;  Deneke, T.  ;  Hindricks, G.  ;  Leclercq, C. 
Citation
 Europace, Vol.22(8) : 1147-1148, 2020-08 
Journal Title
EUROPACE
ISSN
 1099-5129 
Issue Date
2020-08
Abstract
In clinical practice and for scientific purposes, cardiologists and primary care physicians perform risk assessment in patients with cardiac diseases or conditions with high risk of developing such. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) set down this expert consensus statement task force to summarize the consensus regarding risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias. Objectives were to raise awareness of using the right risk assessment tool for a given outcome in a given population, and to provide physicians with practical proposals that may lead to rational and evidence-based risk assessment and improvement of patient care in this regard. A large variety of methods are used for risk assessment and choosing the best methods and tools hereof in a given situation is not simple. Even though parameters and test results found associated with increased risk of one outcome (e.g. death) may also be associated with higher risk of other adverse outcomes, specific risk assessment strategies should be used only for the purposes for which they are validated. The work of this task force is summarized in a row of consensus statement tables. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
DOI
10.1093/europace/euaa065
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Pak, Hui Nam(박희남) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-3620
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/184905
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links