Cited 0 times in

Comparison between Conventional Blind Injections and Ultrasound-Guided Injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A into the Masseter: A Clinical Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김성택-
dc.contributor.author김희진-
dc.contributor.author허경석-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T16:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-21T16:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182627-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to propose a more efficient and safer botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection method for the masseter by comparing the conventional blind injection and a novel ultrasonography (US)-guided injection technique in a clinical trial. The 40 masseters from 20 healthy young Korean volunteers (10 males and 10 females with a mean age of 25.6 years) were included in this prospective clinical trial. The BoNT-A (24 U) was injected into the masseter of each volunteer using the conventional blind and US-guided injection techniques on the left and right sides, respectively, and analyzed by US and three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning. One case of PMB (paradoxical masseteric bulging) was observed on the side where a conventional blind injection was performed, which disappeared after the compensational injection. The reduction in the thickness of the masseter in the resting state differed significantly at 1 month after the injection between the conventional blind injection group and the US-guided injection group by 12.38 ± 7.59% and 17.98 ± 9.65%, respectively (t(19) = 3.059, p = 0.007). The reduction in the facial contour also differed significantly at 1 month after the injection between the conventional blind injection group and the US-guided injection group by 1.95 ± 0.74 mm and 2.22 ± 0.84 mm, respectively (t(19) = 2.908, p = 0.009). The results of the study showed that the US-guided injection method that considers the deep inferior tendon by visualizing the masseter can prevent the PMB that can occur during a blind injection, and is also more effective.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isPartOfTOXINS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleComparison between Conventional Blind Injections and Ultrasound-Guided Injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A into the Masseter: A Clinical Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine (구강내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyungkyu Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJisoo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyle K Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung-Seok Hu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong-Taek Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee-Jin Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/toxins12090588-
dc.contributor.localIdA00588-
dc.contributor.localIdA01225-
dc.contributor.localIdA04342-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02746-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6651-
dc.identifier.pmid32932891-
dc.subject.keywordbotulinum neurotoxin type A injection-
dc.subject.keywordcompensatory hypertrophy-
dc.subject.keywordparadoxical masseteric bulging-
dc.subject.keywordultrasonography guided injection-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Seong Taek-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김성택-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김희진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor허경석-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage588-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTOXINS, Vol.12(9) : 588, 2020-09-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Oral Biology (구강생물학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine (구강내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.