497 627

Cited 40 times in

Cited 20 times in

Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG)

Authors
 Park, H. S.  ;  Kang, B.  ;  Chon, H. J.  ;  Im, H-S  ;  Lee, C-K  ;  Kim, I  ;  Kang, M. J.  ;  Hwang, J. E.  ;  Bae, W. K.  ;  Cheon, J.  ;  Park, J. O.  ;  Hong, J. Y.  ;  Kang, J. H.  ;  Kim, J. H.  ;  Lim, S. H.  ;  Kim, J. W.  ;  Kim, J-W  ;  Yoo, C.  ;  Choi, H. J. 
Citation
 ESMO OPEN, Vol.6(2), 2021-04 
Article Number
 100049 
Journal Title
ESMO OPEN
ISSN
 2059-7029 
Issue Date
2021-04
Keywords
pancreatic cancer ; second-line treatment ; liposomal irinotecan ; FOLFIRINOX
Abstract
Background: There is no clear consensus on the recommended second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have disease progression following gemcitabine-based therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/ leucovorin (FL) and FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) in patients who had failed on the first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients and methods: From January 2015 to August 2019, 378 patients with MPC who had received nal-IRI/FL (n = 104) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) as second-line treatment across 11 institutions were included in this retrospective study. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups, except age and first-line regimens. With a median follow-up of 6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 4.6 months with FOLFIRINOX (P = 0.44). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months with nal-IRI/ FL versus 9.7 months with FOLFRINOX (P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two regimens in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The subgroup analysis revealed that younger age (<70 years) was associated with better OS with FOLFIRINOX. In contrast, older age (>= 70 years) was associated with better survival outcomes with nal-IRI/FL. Adverse events were manageable with both regimens; however, the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy was higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL. Conclusions: Second-line nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX showed similar effectiveness outcomes after progression following first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Age could be the determining factor for choosing the appropriate second-line therapy.
DOI
10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100049
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Choong-kun(이충근) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-5096
Choi, Hye Jin(최혜진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-1400
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182379
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links