0 9

Cited 0 times in

Surgeon Quality Control and Standardization of D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (KLASS-02-QC)

Authors
 Sang-Uk Han  ;  Hoon Hur  ;  Hyuk-Joon Lee  ;  Gyu Seok Cho  ;  Min-Chan Kim  ;  Young Kyu Park  ;  Wook Kim  ;  Woo Jin Hyung 
Citation
 ANNALS OF SURGERY, Vol.273(2) : 315-324, 2021-02 
Journal Title
 ANNALS OF SURGERY 
ISSN
 0003-4932 
Issue Date
2021-02
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Competence* ; Female ; Gastrectomy / standards* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy / standards* ; Lymph Node Excision / standards* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Quality Control* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Stomach Neoplasms / pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms / surgery* ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Objective: To qualify surgeons to participate in a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open distal D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Summary of background data: No studies have sought to qualify surgeons for a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study evaluating unedited videos of laparoscopic and open D2 gastrectomy performed by 27 surgeons. Surgeons performed 3 of each laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomies with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Five peers reviewed each unedited video using a video assessment form. Based on experts' review of videos, a separate review committee decided surgeons as "Qualified" or "Not-qualified." Results: Twelve surgeons (44.4%) were qualified on initial evaluation whereas the other 15 surgeons were not. Another 9 surgeons were finally qualified after re-evaluation. The median score for Qualified was significantly higher than Not-qualified (P < 0.001).Significant differences between Qualified and Not-qualified were noted both in operation type and in all evaluation area of surgical skill, perigastric, and extra-perigastric lymphadenectomy, although the inter-rater variability of the assessment score was low (kappa = 0.285). However, Not-qualified surgeons' scores improved upon re-evaluation of resubmitted videos.When compared laparoscopy with open surgery, median scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = 0.680). However, open gastrectomy scores for surgical skills were significantly higher than for laparoscopic surgery (P = 0.016). Conclusions: Our surgeon quality control study for gastrectomy represents a milestone in surgical standardization for surgical clinical trials. Our methods could also serve as a system for educating surgeons and assessing surgical proficiency.
Full Text
https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=33064386
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003883
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182020
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links