0 40

Cited 0 times in

A comparative study of the efficacy of NAXOZOL compared to celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis

 Moon Soo Park  ;  Chang-Nam Kang  ;  Woo-Suk Lee  ;  Ho-Joong Kim  ;  Sahnghoon Lee  ;  Jin Hwan Kim  ;  Sang-Jin Shin  ;  Seong-Hwan Moon 
 PLOS ONE, Vol.15(1) : e0226184, 2020-01 
Journal Title
Issue Date
Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use* ; Anti-Ulcer Agents / therapeutic use ; Celecoxib / therapeutic use* ; Double-Blind Method ; Esomeprazole / therapeutic use* ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases / prevention & control* ; Humans ; Male ; Naproxen / therapeutic use* ; Osteoarthritis / drug therapy* ; Pain / prevention & control* ; Prospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires
Objective: Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (celecoxib) can minimize the gastrointestinal complications related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. NAXOZOL is a new combination formulation designed to provide sequential delivery of a non-enteric-coated, immediate-release esomeprazole strontium tetrahydrate 20 mg mantle followed by an enteric-coated naproxen 500 mg core. However, there have been no studies comparing NAXOZOL to celecoxib with respect to gastrointestinal tract protection and pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. This study was undertaken to compare the effects of NAXOZOL and celecoxib with respect to gastrointestinal tract protection and pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods: The randomized enrolled patients were divided into two treatment groups: a NAXOZOL group and a celecoxib group. All participants received treatments (NAXOZOL, 500/20 mg (naproxen 500 mg, esomeprazole strontium tetrahydrate 20 mg) twice per day versus celecoxib, 200 mg daily) on a 1:1 allocation basis for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ) score used for non-inferiority testing. Secondary outcome measures included the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, European Quality of Life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) scale and the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Other outcome measures included the use of supplementary or rescue drugs, and the incidence of adverse events. Results: The baseline-adjusted LDQ scores immediately after 12 weeks of treatment in NAXOZOL group were not inferior to those in celecoxib group. The overall change in the baseline-adjusted GSRS score, VAS score, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS was not different between the two groups. The usage of supplementary drugs and the drug-related incidence of adverse events were not different. However, the days to use rescue drug were longer in celecoxib group than in NAXOZOL group. Conclusion: NAXOZOL was not inferior to celecoxib in protecting the gastrointestinal tract and providing pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis.
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Moon, Seong Hwan(문성환)
Lee, Woo Suk(이우석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-1660
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.