0 965

Cited 16 times in

Cited 15 times in

A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

Authors
 Chun, You Jin  ;  Kim, Seong-Geun  ;  Lee, Keun-Wook  ;  Cho, Sang Hee  ;  Kim, Tae Won  ;  Baek, Ji Yeon  ;  Park, Young Suk  ;  Hong, Soojung  ;  Chu, Chong Woo  ;  Beom, Seung-Hoon  ;  Jung, Minkyu  ;  Shin, Sang Joon  ;  Ahn, Joong Bae 
Citation
 CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, Vol.19(3) : E140-E150, 2020-09 
Journal Title
 CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER 
ISSN
 1533-0028 
Issue Date
2020-09
Keywords
Bevacizumab ; Liver resection ; Metastatic colorectal cancer ; Perioperative chemotherapy ; Resectable
Abstract
It remains controversial whether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases gain a survival benefit from perioperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab. We found that the overall survival was improved, but it did not affect progression-free survival from our randomized clinical trial. Patients with high carcinoembryonic antigen levels or over 2 liver metastases may benefit from the overall survival of perioperative chemotherapy. Introduction: Whether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) gain a survival benefit from perioperative chemotherapy remains controversial. The benefit of including bevacizumab in chemotherapy also remains unclear. Material and Methods: Seventy-six patients with CRLM were randomly assigned to either 6 cycles of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)/FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) with bevacizumab before and after surgery or 12 cycles after surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results: The median PFS of all patients was 37.4 months at 5.4 years follow-up, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The PFS between the perioperative group and the postoperative group did not reveal a statistical difference (P = .280). The OS was significantly better in the perioperative group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI],) 0.35-1.02; P = .049). In subgroup patients with carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) >= 5 ng/mL or those with over 2 liver metastases, perioperative group had longer OS than postoperative group (CEA: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.93; P = .030; number of livermetastases: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; P = .049). The largest liver metastases size, disease-free interval, and sidedness did not affect PFS or OS. There was no difference between the 2 groups in postoperative complications with bevacizumab or adverse events during chemotherapy. Conclusions: In patients with resectable CRLMs, perioperative chemotherapy had no effect on PFS, but improved OS. Patients with high CEA levels or over 2 liver metastases may benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
DOI
10.1016/j.clcc.2020.03.004
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Beom, Seung Hoon(범승훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7036-3753
Shin, Sang Joon(신상준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-7241
Ahn, Joong Bae(안중배) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-1503
Jung, Min Kyu(정민규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-3387
Chun, You Jin(천유진)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/180514
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links