0 734

Cited 6 times in

Cited 7 times in

Efficacy and Safety of MT10107 (Coretox) in Poststroke Upper Limb Spasticity Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Drug-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Junekyung-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Min Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Young Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shi-Uk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Deog Young-
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Nam-Jong-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Bum Sun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yoon Ghil-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T17:48:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-01T17:48:39Z-
dc.date.created2021-03-18-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.issn0003-9993-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/180461-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the efficacy and safety of MT10107 (Coretox) with those of onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) in patients with poststroke upper limb spasticity Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled, multicenter, phase III clinical trial. Setting: Seven university hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Participants: Patients (NZ220) with poststroke upper limb spasticity. Interventions: All participants received a single injection of either MT10107 (Coretox group) or onabotulinum toxin A (Botox group). Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was change in wrist flexor spasticity from baseline to week 4, which was assessed using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). The secondary outcomes were MAS scores for wrist, elbow, and finger flexors; percentage of treatment responders (response rate); Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) score, and global assessment of treatment. Safety was evaluated based on adverse events, vital signs, physical examination findings, and laboratory test results. The efficacy and safety were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postintervention. Results: The primary outcome was found to be-1.32 +/- 0.69 and-1.40 +/- 0.69 for the Coretox and Botox groups, respectively. MT10107 showed a non-inferior efficacy compared with onabotulinum toxin A, as the 95% confidence interval for between-group differences was-0.10 to 0.27 and the upper limit was less than the non-inferiority margin of 0.45. Regarding the secondary outcomes, MAS scores for all muscles and DAS scores showed a significant improvement at all time points in both groups, with no significant between-group difference. No significant between-group differences were observed regarding response rate, global assessment of treatment, and safety measures. Conclusions: MT10107 showed no significant difference in efficacy and safety compared with onabotulinum toxin A in poststroke upper limb spasticity treatment. (c) 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders-
dc.relation.isPartOfARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION-
dc.relation.isPartOfARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of MT10107 (Coretox) in Poststroke Upper Limb Spasticity Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Drug-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Rehabilitation Medicine (재활의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Junekyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChun, Min Ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Young Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Shi-Uk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Deog Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPaik, Nam-Jong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwon, Bum Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Yoon Ghil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.025-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00230-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-821X-
dc.subject.keywordBotulinum toxins-
dc.subject.keywordMuscle spasticity-
dc.subject.keywordRehabilitation-
dc.subject.keywordSafety-
dc.subject.keywordStroke-
dc.subject.keywordUpper extremity-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Deog Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Deog Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Yoon Ghil-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85088783625-
dc.identifier.wosid000573084400003-
dc.citation.volume101-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1485-
dc.citation.endPage1496-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, Vol.101(9) : 1485-1496, 2020-09-
dc.identifier.rimsid68910-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBotulinum toxins-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMuscle spasticity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRehabilitation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSafety-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorStroke-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUpper extremity-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOXIN TYPE-A-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBOTULINUM-TOXIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASHWORTH SCALE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOST STROKE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOPEN-LABEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRELIABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNEUROTOXIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERRATER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREVALENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINJECTION-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRehabilitation-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySport Sciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRehabilitation-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSport Sciences-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine (재활의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.