0 55

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robotic and Conventional Approaches in Patients with Pre- and Poststyloid Parapharyngeal Space Tumors

Authors
 Jae-Yol Lim  ;  Young Min Park  ;  Min Seok Kang  ;  Da Hee Kim  ;  Eun Chang Choi  ;  Se-Heon Kim  ;  Yoon Woo Koh 
Citation
 ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.27(11) : 4535-4543, 2020-10 
Journal Title
 ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 
ISSN
 1068-9265 
Issue Date
2020-10
Abstract
Background: Benefits and drawbacks of robotic surgical approaches for parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors remain undetermined. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes of PPS tumor patients who underwent robotic surgery with those of patients who received conventional surgical treatment. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathologic data from 136 patients who underwent surgical removal of PPS tumors via conventional or robotic approaches. Results: We identified PPS tumors in pre- and poststyloid regions in 87 (64%) and 49 (36%) patients, respectively. There were 48 (35.3%) pleomorphic adenomas, 36 (26.5%) schwannomas, and 24 (17.6%) paragangliomas. Conventional surgical techniques were performed in 83 patients, and robotic surgical approaches were administered to 53 patients. Transcervical-parotid and transcervical approaches were most commonly performed in conventional surgery, while transoral and retroauricular approaches were the preferred surgical methods in robotic surgery for pre- and poststyloid PPS tumors, respectively. Robotic surgery resulted in less estimated blood loss during poststyloid PPS tumor surgery. Postoperative cranial nerve complications were noted in 36 of 83 cases (43.4%) in the conventional surgery group and in 17 of 53 cases (32.1%) in the robotic surgery group. Intraoperative tumor spillage of pleomorphic adenoma showed no significant differences between the two groups (13.6% in conventional vs. 15.4% in robotic surgery). The mean follow-up time was 4.9 ± 3.4 years, and recurrences were observed in two patients during follow-up without a significant difference between the two groups (4.5% in conventional vs. 3.8% in robotic surgery). Conclusions: Robotic surgery in PPS tumors is feasible through transoral, retroauricular, or combined approaches and provides treatment outcomes comparable to those of conventional open surgery.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-020-08536-0
DOI
10.1245/s10434-020-08536-0
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology (이비인후과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Koh, Yoon Woo(고윤우)
Kim, Da Hee(김다희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-1334
Kim, Se Heon(김세헌)
Park, Young Min(박영민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-8461
Lim, Jae Yol(임재열) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-6414
Choi, Eun Chang(최은창)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/180081
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links